DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC
20374.5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No:
27 November 2001
7615-01
This is in reference to
provisions of title IO of the
your- application
fiu- correction of your naval record pursuant to the
Ilnited States Code, section
1552.
for-
Board
of‘ the
(correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
A three-member panel
session, considered your application on 27 November
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings
your application, together with
applicable statutes, regulations
opinion furnished by
CMC
attached.
Documcnt~~ry material considered by the Board consisted of
mterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
1 RAP of 7 November 2001, a copy of which is
all
and policies.
IiieI1loran~llllll
of this Board.
. Your allegations of error and
I
200
IO0
and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
After careful
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will
your application has been denied. The names and votes of
~rpon request.
be furnished
Accordingly,
your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
of‘
the
circun~stances
It is regretted that
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
demonstrate the existence
probable material error or
illjustice.
of‘
upon submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
on the applicant to
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE
NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 221344103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1001
RAP
7NovOl
RESERVE AFFAIRS DIVISION COMMENT on
Tasker
#20011029-01
Subj:
APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD; CASE OF
Ref:
Encl:
(a)
MC0
PlOOlR.lJ
(1) Ltr from
Aurora
Medical Center of
(2) Reserve Absence Remarks
(3) Notification of Participation Requirements For
Mandatory Participants
(4) Unsatisfactory Participation Worksheet
Ott 99
(5) Battery A
(6) Administrative Reduction Order For
ltr 1900 CO dtd 25
Unsatisfactory Participation
(7) Marine Forces Reserve
ltr 1900
G-1P dtd 02 May
2000
PFC
1.
calendar year
reinstatement to the rank of Lance Corporal.
cannot be excused for missed drills during
.
Further PFC Salisbury is not eligible for
PFC
2.
snowmobile accident, he should be excused for
perform during calendar year 1999.
contends that due to injuries resulting from a
IDTs he failed to
PFC
was a SMCR member of Battery A, 1st Battalion,
3.
14th Marines, in Aurora, Colorado.
snowmobile accident on 28 Feb 99.
diagnosed with severe blunt chest injuries consisting of
multiple rib fractures,
collapsed lung.
Aurora Medical Center the same day.
discharged from the hospital in less than one week.
blood in his chest cavity, and a
He was admitted to the Trauma Unit of the
He was injured in a
Per enclosure (1) he was
He recovered enough to be
Reference (a)
4 .
the Medical Department Representative (MDR)
unit within five days after the injury. He
attempt to contact the unit and inform them
3105.6a required PFC
para
0 notify
CO/OIC/I&I of his
or
did not make any
of the accident
Subj:
APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL'RECORD; CASE OF
until late 1999,
report for mandatory
over six months later.
IDTs during this period.
Further he failed to
Enclosure (2).
(3),
(4),
Per enclosures
5.
attempted to contact
we're unable to reach hi
declared to be an unsatisfactory participant and was
administratively reduced from the rank of
effective date of 31
and,*_(s),
PFC
Personnel from Battery A
on numerous occasions but
was
sult, PFC
Ott 99 as indicated in enclosure (6).
LCpl to PFC with an
Battery A submitted a medi
After consultation with PFC
6.
rank,
Naval Bureau of Medicine
directed by Marine Forces
proceedings as a result of PFC
physically qualified (NPQ) for
per enclosure (7).
& Surgery.
Reser
upon his reduction in
arge package to the
On 02 May 00,
Battery A was
ate discharge
eing found not
ty in the Marine Corps
IDTs he missed.
could have been designated as Temporarily Not
7 .
Physically Qualified (TPNQ) and therefore excused from
performing the
requires that the Marine comply with the instructions of
3105.6a,
PFC Salisbury made no attempt to inform his unit of his medical
condition until after receiving a notice of pending
Had he simply called his chain of
administrative reduction.
command they would have taken an active interest in his welfare
and helped him to request TPNQ status.
before the scheduled
this designation
reference (a),
However,
IDTs take place.
para
was later found to be NPQ during
The fact that PFC
does not excuse his blatant disregard for communication
8.
2000,
and coordination with his unit during 1999.
commanding officer made persistent attempts to provide him the
opportunity to comply with the applicable requirements based on
his condition.
The unit took the appropriate response when he
failed to comply and his administrative reduction in rank should
stand as executed.
The unit and his
The point of contact concerning this matter is Maj
9.
at (703)
784-9136/40.
L
I’
Subj:
APPLICATION FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD; CASE OF
Personnel Plans and
Head,
Policy Branch
Reserve Affairs Division
By direction
USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00153
“While I was serving my Reserve obligation I was put on TNPQ, Temporarily Not Physically Qualified, status because of a shoulder injury I received in the summer of 1995. Being that there was no record of my injury I was labeled as UNSAT and was given an “Under other than honorable” administrative discharge from the reserves. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01084
MD02-01084 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020723, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. (Exhibit M) This Marine exercised his right granted under Marine Corps Order 1900.16F, paragraph 6303, 3(a)(5) to obtain copies of all documents that were forwarded to the Commanding General supporting the proposed discharge on October 24, 1992. 930108: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05542-00
A’three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. DC 203746023 NAVY YARD REPLY REFER TO 00-1 9 IN 542 0 Ser: 24 Ott 200 0 From: To: Subj: Ref: Director, Executive Director, Naval Council of Personnel...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10364-05
Additionally, the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) has not removed the administrative reduction from XXXX record. You requested we provide an advisory opinion on Corporal Ramirez’s (hereinafter “Applicant”) application to reinstate his previous rank of Sergeant (Applicant was administratively reduced to Corporal) -2. Applicant claims he was reduced to Private First Class (PFC), but there is no documented evidence in Applicant’s record stating this reduction took place.4.
USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00307
MD99-00307 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981222, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant provided no documentation of his post-service. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09598-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Bureau of Naval Personnel, a copy of which is enclosed. Therefore we do not support his petition wit1 As indicated in reference (b), Ex-Chief Petty Officer 3. * P * Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF after his discharge, Ex-Chief Petty requested reinstatement in March, 1965.
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00243
Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.971114: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.971207: Counseled for unsatisfactory participation in the SMCR, specifically unexcused absence from IDT on 971206 and 971207. ...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601021
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided.970611: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.970617: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii directed the Applicant's discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of unsatisfactory performance due to weight control failure. You may view DoD...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600324
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). [unsigned]961112: Member found medically qualified for separation.970206: Unsatisfactory Participation Letter and Notification of Intent for Admin Reduction mailed out this date.970306: Applicant was administratively reduced to Pvt this date due to unsatisfactory participation.980612: SJA review determined the case sufficient in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01187-99
authoriz s been 344 days of became eligible for promotion to Selected Marine Corps Reserve (SMCR) promotion board however, was not selected due to keen 1993 selection message. selected for promotion by any of the boards who considered his record. Head, Reserve Affairs Personnel Management Branch Reserve Affairs Division By direction r DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT HARRY LEE HALL, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA I7 LEJEUNE...