DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2
NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SMC
Docket No: 07178-99
29 June 2000
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
SSG
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
USMC,
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
_
‘r
(1) DD Form 149 dtd
(2) MCCDC memo dtd 9JunO0
(3) Subject’s naval record
4Nov99 w/attachments
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) the entry
reflecting his assignment to the weight control program on
MCTFS printout reflecting this entry is at Tab A.
15 January 1995. A copy of the
2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Moidel and Newman and Mr. Geisler, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 2000 and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the Marine Corps Combat Development
b.
Command office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable
action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That the MCTFS data be corrected by removing the entry reflecting Petitioner
assignment to the weight control program on 15 January 1995.
’s
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board
recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner
that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.
’s
’s record and
c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner
’s naval record be returned
to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a part of
Petitioner ’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
A!mdGd
JONATHAN S.
Acting Recorder
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
4
RUSKIN
4iT.Aa
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
F= w. DEAN
ZEIFFER
Executive Director
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
MARINE CORPS COMBAT DEVELOPMENT COMMAND
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5001
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1500
C 461TP
09 Jun 00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE
NAVAL RECORDS
DIRECTOR,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
Subj:
PLICATI
USMC,
STAFF SERGEANT
Ref:
(a)
MC0
6100.10B, Weight Control and Military Appearance
1.
The following Advisory Opinion is provided:
a.
Marines must be me
to weight control; however
was not conducted.
ted prior to formal assignment
indicated that the evaluation
b.
ssgt
for an alter
alternate weights in lieu of an assignment to weight control.
stated he was not given an "opportunity to apply
ght"
reference (a) did not allow for
- in 1995,
C .
The enclose
reports raise several issues: The command
did not identify SS
weight control assignment in his first
the fitness report of
fitness report of 940816-950228.
951222-970228,
referred to an alternate weight of 235 lbs, yet at the
time, SNM exceeded this weight by 6 lbs; therefore, he was actually a
candidate for weight control.
Additionally,
d.
December 1997 alternate weight waiver was contrary
lowing release of
.Even if Maj
ssgt
to reference
which eliminated waivers.
secondary (body fat) screen,
skinfold measurement was not in accordance with reference (a), nor the
Department of Defense Directive 1308.3,
Program, which directs that only tape/circumferential measurements be
used to determine percent body fat.
/97 in October 1997,
was referring to a
e weight, his use of
Physical Fitness and Body Fat
2 .
Summar
y
a .
Based on the information provided,
SSgt
weight control without the benefit and requirem
evaluation,
as directed by reference (a).
was assigned to
fitness report of 940816-950228 did not accurately address
weight control assignment, as it should have.
SSg
of 951222-970228 should not have been listed as "outstanding"
out of standards by exceeding his alternate weight.
The report
- SNM was
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
C .
1997
-
reference (a).
There were no alternate weight waivers granted after October
December 1997 waiver was not in accordance with
Bottom line, concur with
3.
initial assignment entry to the weight
equest for removal of his
control program.
4.
T&E point of contact
is
at
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03527-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be (MCTFS) entry reflecting his corrected by removing the Marine Corps Total Force System placement on weight control from 15 January to 5 May 1997. + ,y ,y i -* MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF GUNNERY USMC SERGEANT Encl: ( 1 )...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03823-03
MCTFS and medical records supports her commander's action that appears to have followed appropriate administrative procedures when she was assigned to the weight control program on 19970818. The ACHCP commented on her medical The information recorded to her However, the Marine Corps Subj: SE OF CORPORA b. It may be possible that an entry was entered in her medical records to support her initial assignment, not available in her application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600904
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :941105: Reenlisted this date for a term of 4 years.950607: Applicant’s Reporting Senior and Reviewing Officer reported approved alternate weight standard of 218 pounds on Applicant’s fitness report for period 950301 – 950403.960108: Applicant’s Reporting Senior and Reviewing Officer reported approved alternate weight standard of 220 pounds on Applicant’s fitness report for period 950403 – 960108.960208: Applicant referred to Credentialed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04908-99
On 5 May 1998 Petitioner was erroneously assigned to the Promotion photos dated 25 February 1998 weight control program. report was removed from his record on 22 April 1999. enclosure (4). See This h. On 26 February 1999 Petitioner requested remedial consideration for promotion to staff sergeant based on the removal of the erroneous remark pertaining to being in the weight control program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06143-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 10 March 1998. Staff Sergean not assigned to the w 6100.10. and 980301 through 98103'0 do not a e. Upon the completion of enclosure (4) to MC0 6100.10, a page MC0 11 entry is authorized...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600679
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ex-Pvt, USMCDocket No. Decisional Issues Equity – Quality of service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from T. L. S_, SSgt, USMC, dated November 30, 2000Three pages from Applicant’s service recordApplicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501041
The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. rd time on weight control. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500447
Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Applicant’s DD Form 214 Two pages from Applicant’s service record Character reference, dated November 15, 2004 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940114 - 940619 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 940620 Date of Discharge: 970725 Length of Service...
USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00989
Corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.950216: Weight evaluation: Weight 208 pounds. Specifically, the applicant had two instances of misconduct, counseling for negotiating worthless checks (in Aug 95) and CO’s NJP for using provoking words and conduct unbecoming a US Marine (in Mar 95). Regardless of any medical injury, the applicant was still required to keep within body fat standards.