DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 7173-01
19 December 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
application on 18 December 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 June 1958 at
The record reflects that you received nonjudicial
age 17.
The
punishment and were convicted by a special court-martial.
offenses included unauthorized absences totalling 32 days.
A second special court-martial convened on 29 December 1960 and
you were found guilty of an unauthorized absence of 67 days.
court sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for six months,
forfeitures of $70 per month for six months, reduction in rank,
and a bad conduct discharge.
discharge on 29 May 1961.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacerization of your discharge due
totalled more than
to the fact that your unauthorized absences
Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that
three months.
no change to the discharge is warranted.
You received the bad conduct
The
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06564-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. A second special court-martial convened on 29 October 1973 and you were found guilty of unauthorized absences totalling 7.9 days. factors were not sufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06348-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06167-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences total-led more than six months. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05560-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to.the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled nearly Accordingly, your Based on the foregoing,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04900-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. included an unauthorized absence of 24 days and drunk and disorderly conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04486-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00121-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Navy Board of Review affirmed the findings and the sentence on 29 February 1963 and the supervisory authority reduced the confinement and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01963-01
You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, forfeitures of $240 per month for two months, reduction in rank to PVT (E-l), and a bad conduct discharge. the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two NJPs and a special court-martial conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08488-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. injustice were reviewed in regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled more than eight months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08395-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct and especially the special court-martial conviction for 47 days of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...