DEP
4RTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FO I CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
W
\SHlNGTON DC 2037
0 510 0
JRE
Docket No: 7133-00
11 June 2001
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the United
ltates Code, section 1552.
:
applicaf on for correction
of your naval record pursuant to the
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with a iministrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
ntary material considered by the Board consisted of your
Documc
proceedings of this Board.
materi,
II submitted in
application, together with all
applicable statutes, regulations and
1
lolicies.
supl>ort thereof, your naval record and
emire record, the Board found that the
After careful and conscientious con! ideration of the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
OI active duty in the Marine Corps from 23 March to 10
The Board found that you served
May 1971, when you were
discharged as a training failure because of the residual effects of
polio. You apparently suffered from that condition prior to enlisting, and concealed that fact
when you underwent your pre-entry physical
examinatj.on. As you have not demonstrated
that you were unfit for duty
because of a disability incurred in or aggravated by your brief
period of service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case.
Accordingly, your application has
panel will be furnished upon
blzen denied. The names and votes of the members of the
reques
.
cikcumstance: of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
It is regretted that the
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other
regard, it is important to keep in m nd that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
mattl:r not previously considered by the Board.
In this
records. Consequently, when
burden is on the applicant to demor strate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
appl! ing for a correction of an official naval record, the
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06556-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on this evaluation, you were processed for an administrative separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02077-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02033-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00441-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06653-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 28 May 2001 you were separated from the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06920-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An administrative discharge board which convened on 11 July 2001 found that you had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, commission of a serious offense, and driving under the influence of alcohol, and recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a general discharge. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07576-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 November 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01104-01
Correction,of Naval A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. have the best reenlistment code authorized by regulations, and have been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of hardship, the Board could not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06403-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. The Board concluded that you were not physically qualified for military service, and that you would not have been permitted to enlist had you disclosed the disqualifying conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00181-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...