DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Y
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No:
15 October 2001
1873-01
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,
Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 30 September
1968 after seven years of prior active service in the Air Force.
The record reflects that you received three nonjudicial
punishments.
totalling 56 days, breaking restriction,
appointed place of duty.
The offenses included unauthorized absences
and absence from your
When informed of the recommendation, you elected to
On 30 September 1969 the commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of
unfitness.
waive the right to present the case to an administrative
discharge board.
a general discharge, and further stated that execution of the
discharge would be suspended until 15 December 1970.
23 March 1970 you became an unauthorized absentee until 20 April
1970.
Subsequently, you received a general discharge on 23 June
1970.
After review, the discharge authority, directed
However, on
In
its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
such as the contention that you
potentially mitigating factors,
were an alcoholic but now you are a minister.
concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of
frequent involvement with military authorities.
the Board noted that you were the subject of three disciplinary
actions within a period of less than two years and an
unauthorized absence of 27 days while in a probationary period.
Further, you were given an opportunity to complete your
enlistment when the discharge authority suspended the discharge
and placed you on probation.
advantage of this opportunity.
concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
In this regard,
However, the Board
However, you failed to take
Based on the foregoing, the Board
-
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02171-01
Board also noted that the initial sentence to a bad conduct discharge was suspended, better discharge. which resulted in the discharge being executed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12776-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in three NUP’s, conviction by SPCM for periods of UA totaling over five months, and the fact that you were given an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00690-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. The BCD was subsequently suspended for six months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02540-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2000. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of an NJP, and the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court-martial for three periods of UA. The Board noted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05490-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOF, CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370 510 0 TRG Docket No: 6 June 2001 5490-00 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. injustice were reviewed regulations and procedures...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01386-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 24 February 1970 you were So discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03764-01
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. you& appointed place of duty On 25 October 1983 vou received was On 15 November 1983 the BCD was to be executed, Subsequently, the suspension of the forfeitures and BCD were vacated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden‘is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR437 13
’ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2013, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03787-01
Thereafter, the discharge authority approved the request and directed an undesirable discharge and you were so discharged on 26 February 1970. Board concluded that the foregoing factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three NJPs, convictions by a summary and a special court-martial, and the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court-martial for a 31-day period of UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01298-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2009. , after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error of injustice. Your request for discharge was granted and on 19 December 1972, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial...