DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
TJR
Docket No: 6627-99
28 June 2000
Dear
B
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 June 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 September
1947 at the age of 18.
nearly a year without incident until 3 August 1948 when you
received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for leaving your post
without being properly relieved and were awarded reduction to
private.
affray and were awarded bread and water for four days
On 20 December 1949 you received NJP for engaging in an
Your record reflects that you served
Your record further reflects that on 24 January 1950 you were
convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of unauthorized use of a
government vehicle.
month and a $75 forfeiture of pay.
your third NJP for assault while engaged in an affray.
punishment imposed was bread and water for five days.
You were sentenced to confinement for a
On 8 May 1950 you received
The
On 25 September 1951,
were released from active duty under honorable conditions and
transferred to the Naval Reserve.
a general discharge.
at the expiration of your enlistment, you
Subsequently, you were issued
Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall
trait averages which are computed from marks assigned during
periodic evaluations.
of 4.0 in conduct was required at the time of your separation for
a fully honorable characterization of service.
Your conduct average was 3.74.
An average
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and your contention that you would like
your discharge upgraded.
factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your discharge
given your frequent misconduct,
was insufficiently high to warrant an honorable discharge.
all the circumstances of your case,
discharge was proper and no change is warranted.
your application has been denied.
However, the Board concluded these
and since your conduct average
Given
the Board concluded your
Accordingly,
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously-considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02150-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02621-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04749-02
The punishment imposed was confinement for five days with You were sentenced to confinement for The On 4 February 1943, you received NJP for manufacturing and selling liberty passes and disrespect to a commissioned officer. The punishment imposed was confinement for five days with bread and water. On 15 March 1943 you were convicted by a SCM of a 22 day period of unauthorized absence, You were sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02684-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 WMP Docket No: 3 October 2002 2684-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval United States Code section 1552. record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10963-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 13 June 1947, you were convicted by SCM of absence from your appointed place of duty and disobedience.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07803-01
10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. August and again on 15 December 1978 you received NJP for nine periods of absence from your appointed place of duty. convicted by summary court-martial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06337-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06500-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07312-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. NJPs, the Board concluded that the Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07237-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...