DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 6473-00
21 September 2001
-.-
-.-
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 September 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary. material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board concluded that although you had elevated cholesterol and triglyceride levels prior
to your release from active duty in 1984, and may have had suffered from some degree of
atherosclerosis and/or coronary artery disease, the associated impairment, if any, was of such
mild degree that it did not meet the criteria for a disability rating under the Veterans
Administration (VA) Schedule for Rating Disabilities.
VA granted you service connection and a 30% rating for coronary artery disease, effective
from 25 June 199
Navy record. As you did not have a ratable cardiovascular condition at the time of your
release from active duty, there is no basis for granting your request for an increased
combined disability rating. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
1, is not considered probative of the existence of error or injustice in your
The fact that on 2 October 1998, the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06977-01
” The Board noted that it is the function of an MEB, which is composed entirely of physicians, to report on the state of health of the service member who is the subject of the MEB, and to recommend referral of the member to the PEB in appropriate cases. In reference to the question of why Petitioner's cardiac and pulmonary conditions found not unfitting at the time of his initial PEB adjudication and placement on the TDRL, reference Petitioner's original 14 February 1992 Medical Evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05882-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that any of the additional conditions rated by the VA rendered you unfit to reasonably perform your Military duties, and that you were entitled to a combined rating from the Department of the Navy of 30% or higher, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09581-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08319-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2011. Unlike the VA, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating at the time of separation or retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05686
On 18 Jun 09, an informal physical evaluation board (IPEB) determined the applicants coronary heart disease was unfitting for continued military service and recommended he be discharged with severance pay with a disability rating of 10 percent. The DVA Schedule for Rating disabilities indicates the applicants coronary artery disease rating fell at or below the criteria for a 10 percent disability rating; as he was also rated by the DVA. While the Board acknowledges the comment by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02038
The Medical Consultant concludes the 20 November 2002 LOD Determination was medically correct however special rules for Reserve members with over 8 years of active military service who are called to active duty for more than 30 days come into play. The Applicant has accumulated over 8 years of active service prior to his mobilization, and thus if he had been referred for evaluation in the DES prior to release from active duty and found unfit, his existing prior to service condition would...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00254
(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The service ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. In addition to any condition determined to be unfitting by the PEB, the Board’s recommendations are confined to those conditions determined to be unfitting at the time of the CI’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011895
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Hypertension means high blood pressure. The fact that the applicant was treated for coronary artery disease and hypertension following his assignment to Vietnam does not fulfill this requirement.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00757
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1200757BRANCH OF SERVICE: ArmyBOARD DATE: 20140225 Coronary artery disease (CAD) . Physical Disability Board of Review
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013845
The applicant states according to the attached Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 22 February 2014, her ex-husband was awarded retroactive benefits (100 percent for coronary artery disease) due to a Federal court case. f. The FSM's son may be entitled to additional accrued benefits based on full or partial concurrent receipt of VA compensation and military retired pay under the CRSC and/or CRDP programs. The applicant requests retroactive CRSC or CRDP associated...