DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 6368-01
14 December 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 December 2001.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 December 1983
at age 19.
A general court-martial convened on 23 September 1988
and found you guilty of an unauthorized absence of 920 days.
The
court sentenced you to confinement for seven months, forfeiture
of all pay and allowances, and a bad conduct discharge.
received the bad conduct discharge on 29 August 1989.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
such as your youth and immaturity
and personal problems.
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge due to the fact that your period of unauthorized
absence was well over two years.
Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Based on the foregoing, the
The names and
You are entitled to have the
You
However, the Board concluded that these
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07173-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacerization of your discharge due totalled more than to the fact that your unauthorized...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05699-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your disciplinary The Board found record, especially the special court-martial conviction for a lengthy period of unauthorized...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06167-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences total-led more than six months. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04713-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02762-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge totalled nearly a due to the fact that your unauthorized absences year. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05874-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization The record reflects that you received four nonjudicial The offenses included unauthorized absences You received the bad conduct discharge on 24...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02849-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, you received three more nonjudicial The offenses included unauthorized absences You received the bad conduct discharge on 22 However, the Board concluded that these factors were In its review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03454-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 12 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received the bad conduct discharge on 11 December 1953. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03431-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicdnt to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05505-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, it is clear that you would have been issued an undesirable discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment if you had not been convicted by court-martial of the unauthorized absences. Consequently, when...