Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06337-00
Original file (06337-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 6337-00
6 August 2001

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:
Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF
Bti
(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be
corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the
general discharge issued on 20 August 1951.
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Gilbert, Mr. Ivins, and Mr.
Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 18 July 2001 and,
pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its -merits.
c. Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 9 April 1947
after more than three months of prior active service.
At that
time, Petitioner reported that he had a wife and three children.
d. On 28 March 1951 Petitioner filled out a dependency form

that correctly stated that he had four dependents.

e. On 28 June 1951 Petitioner was informed that he was not

However, he
eligible for active duty if he had four dependents.
could submit an affidavit stating that four dependents would not
While his response is not in the record,
constitute a hardship.
it appears that he did not submit the required affidavit.
Subsequently, on 20 August 1951 he received a general discharge
Petitioner was not
by reason of convenience of the government.
assigned any marks during this period of service.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner never
action.
concealed the fact that he had four dependents.
there is no adverse action in his record, the Board does not
believe his record warranted the characterization that he
received.
discharge should be recharacterized to honorable.
In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes that the

Further, since

the Board finds the existence of an

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
was issued an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the
government on 20 August 1951 vice the general discharge issued on
that date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

C . That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be informed

that Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 18
September 2000.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

2

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Executive

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06761-01

    Original file (06761-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 CRS Docket No: 6761-01 10 December 2001 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary-of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: Encl: (a) 10 U.S.C. The board recommended discharge. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04930-01

    Original file (04930-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    4930-01 19 November 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. On 24 November e. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3G or RE- 4 reenlistment code to individual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03464-01

    Original file (03464-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the general discharge discharge issued on 5 October 1958. applied to this Board The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and 2. The record reflects that he was d. The medical record reflects that Petitioner was admitted to a Naval hospital on 5 September 1956 and, on 20 September 1956, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01854-99

    Original file (01854-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1854-99 12 August 1999 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy/Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06450-01

    Original file (06450-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6450-01 29 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy From: To: Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 December 1952. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01045-02

    Original file (01045-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that the reason for her discharge from the Navy be changed to hardship so that she will be eligible to receive Montgomery G.I. discharge, it appears that had she been properly advised and remained on active duty until the birth of her child, on 5 June 1994, she would be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00501-01

    Original file (00501-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Carlsen injustice on 4 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. me that he was given a Purple Heart while still in the hospital but he thought that he was injured because the building had collapsed due to the weather and he refused the medal... (Petitioner) told f. The Navy and Marine Corps Awards Manual provides that in order to be eligible for the Purple Heart Medal,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00940-01

    Original file (00940-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show entitlement to the Montgomery G. I. (Petitioner) requested to be separated from the U. An SPD of JDF would indicate that her separation was involuntary and she would be entitled to at least 28 months of MGIB benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03754-01

    Original file (03754-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 23 June 1953. Thereafter, the commanding officer He was e. On 2 June 1953 an administrative discharge board convened in the Bureau of Naval Personnel and recommended an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness. (e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07026-00

    Original file (07026-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket 16 March 2001 No.7026-00 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy , Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF 'I Ref: Encl: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record 1. reenlistment code means Petitioner was discharged for this reason. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected ing the RE-4 reenlistment...