DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 5844-01
31 August 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 23 August 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you were discharged from the Naval Reserve on 28 April 2001, after
being found not physically qualified for further service by the Physical Evaluation Board.
Your disqualifying condition was a psychotic disorder, not otherwise specified. Your
unsubstantiated contention to the effect that you never suffered from such a disorder was
considered insufficient to demonstrate that the diagnosis which resulted in your discharge is
erroneous. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
In this
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03333-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05480-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07597-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, on 3 October 1990 you received an At that time you were assigned a reenlistment A psychiatric conducted on 22 June 1990, found that you had a post traumatic stress disorder, and The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07576-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 November 2001. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00461-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09388-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 2 July 2001. You were discharged by reason of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05283-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, -when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05285-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 August 2001. The available records do not establish that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of your release from active duty or for several years thereafter, or that you were unfit for duty when separated from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06155-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2001. service or alleged murder-related post traumatic stress disorder to the VA rating officials. The Board was not persuaded that the misconduct which resulted in your discharge from the Navy was caused by or related to undiagnosed mental disorder, that your misconduct was significantly extenuated or mitigated by your mental state, or that you were...