Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05352-01
Original file (05352-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No:  
10 October 200 1

5352-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title  

Ilnitecl States Code, section  

10 of the  

1552.

10 October 200  

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
and policies.
applicable statutes, regulations  
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
I3 September 2001, a copy of

1780 PERS 604 of  

. Your allegations of error and injustice
I 

.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the. Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The   names and votes of
the members   of the panel will 

be furnished upon request.

of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.

It is regretted that the circumstances  
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
ofticial records. Consequently,

 

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
NAVY  PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

Y

MEMORANDUM  FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

. Via:

Assistant  for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

Subj:

Ref:

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 14 Aug 01
(b) Title   38, United States Code, Chapter   30

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a):

request to add

Servicemembers

a.

Recommend the board deny

NCF Program is available only at the time of

Navy College Fund (NCF) Program enlistment guarantee to his
master record.
enlistment and is not offered to every recruit.
must have entered active duty on or after 21 November 1989 and
agreed to enlist in a qualifying rating identified as "critical
or hard-to-fill"
Servicemembers who entered active duty before 7 July 1992 must
have had an AFQT sco
Because Mr
Program.
on  27 April 1991,
Program.
The Enlistment Document (DD Form 4) is the official
document used to identify those servicemembers who receive the
NCF Program as part of their enlistment guarantee.

he was never eligible to be offered NCF

higher to qualify for NCF
.had  a  58 AFQT score and enlisted

and meet the criteria outlined in reference (b).

b.

A review of

master record  
indicat
was guaranteed "Hospi
listed as a guarantee

annex to his DD Form 4 in his
he Navy 27 April 1991 and
NCF Program is 
not
rwas never eligible.
precluded the classifier
at the time of his
eceived  from the
g his educational benefits

him NCF
P
The letter

enlistment.
Department of Veterans
was erroneous as he was never entitled to receive NCF Program
benefits.
2 .
elected to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill
(MGIB) Program on 7 October 1991 and is entitled to receive 36
months of MGIB Program benefits.
is  $650 per month for full time enrollment in school.
The
monthly entitlement is adjusted yearly based on the Consumer
Price Index.

The current educational benefit

Commander,,U.S.  Navy
Director,
Navy Drug 
Behavioral Health, Federal  
Education,
and Partnerships
Division (PERS-60)

& Alcohol,
-



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02211-01

    Original file (02211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Recommend the Board deny s request to add Navy an enlistment option to NCF Program is a guarantee offered only at College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee as his master record. he is not entitled to receive NCF .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05093-01

    Original file (05093-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is important iil_justice. offered only at the discretion of the classifier, not the field If NCF Program funding and quotas are exhausted at recruiter. he is not entitled to receive NCF Program e annex to his DD Form 4 a Since the documents c initiale evident A review of 2. elected to enroll in Montgomery GI...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02011-01

    Original file (02011-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HN Sartor's annex to his DD Form 4 indicates he was guaranteed "Hospital Corpsman (Five Year Obligation) Program," but not NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02527-01

    Original file (02527-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03055-01

    Original file (03055-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 31 July 2001 3055-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Recommend the Board deny EM3 m$request to add Navy College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee to his master as well as the Enlistment Bonus (EB) NCF Program, record. is an enlistment incentive program...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07343-00

    Original file (07343-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (DD Form 1966) informing him what enlistment guarantees he would receive and again, He also reviewed and initialed his Enlistment Contract ,made to him other than those listed on this NCF Program was not listed. lected to enroll in the MGIB Program on is entitled to receive 36 months of benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00982-01

    Original file (00982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. master microfiche record indicates she elected Per reference A review b. Additional1 College Fund (NCF) explained to ETSN not enroll in the MGIB Program was correct. the member must be enrolled in the MGIB Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_49_23 CDT 2000

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not all applicants are offered the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03190-99

    Original file (03190-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The program-may have been referring to is the Navy College Fund (NCF) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05924-01

    Original file (05924-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 DD Form 149 w/attachments MGIB Election Form NPC Memo 1780 Subject's microfiche record Pers-604 dated 25 September 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, 1. hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, enclosure applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to the $30,000 Navy College Fund Program (NCF) in conjunction with the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB)Program. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and...