Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02527-01
Original file (02527-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X

2 NAVY ANNE

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 2527-01
31 July 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 29 June 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

N AVY PERSONNEL COMMAN

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

Y

D

1780
PERS-604
29 Jun 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB)

IONS ICO

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 31 May 01
(b) Title 38,

United States Code, Chapter 30

1%.

1.

The

following is provided in response to reference (a):

Recommend the Board deny
Fund (NCF) Program guarantee to his master record.
as well as the Enlistment Bonus (EB) Program, is an

a.
College
Program,
enlistment incentive program that can only be offered at the time
of enlistment.
NCF Program could not be offered to
Program.
classifier.
document used to identify all enlistment guarantees.

enlistment, by law,
recruits opting for the EB
Both programs are offered at the sole discretion of the
The Enlistment Document (DD Form 4) is the official

request to add Navy
NCF

At the time of

b.

A review of
30 September 1994 h
School."
"Divefarer/Special  Warfare Guarantee Program and  
Enlistment Bonus Program," but not NCF Program.

He reclassified-on

1995-and  was guaranteed
$2,500.00
Because

DD Form 4 indicates on
ed "Torpedoman Class "A"

9 June 

fact that

ffered an Enlistment Bonus, at the time of his

he could not be offered NCF Program.
did not complete the required training
s enlistment bonus in no way guarantees
r any other enlistment incentive program.
is not eligible for NCF Program.
initialed both annexes to his DD Form 4

d this document and the information was
rative inconsistencies pertaining to

The

enlistment guarantees exist in his master record.

elected to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB)

2
The present educational assistance
Program on 13 July 1995.
benefit for full time enrollment in school is $650.00 per month
for 36 months.
on the Consumer Price Index.

The monthly entitlement is adjusted yearly based

PERS-604's point of contact is Mr. Linden Butler who can be

3.
reached at (C) 901-874-4246 or DSN   882-4246.

ATIONS  ICO

Commander, U.S. Navy
Director,
Navy Drug 
Behavioral Health, Federal
& Partnerships
Education,
Division (PERS-60)

& Alcohol,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03055-01

    Original file (03055-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 31 July 2001 3055-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Recommend the Board deny EM3 m$request to add Navy College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee to his master as well as the Enlistment Bonus (EB) NCF Program, record. is an enlistment incentive program...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05093-01

    Original file (05093-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is important iil_justice. offered only at the discretion of the classifier, not the field If NCF Program funding and quotas are exhausted at recruiter. he is not entitled to receive NCF Program e annex to his DD Form 4 a Since the documents c initiale evident A review of 2. elected to enroll in Montgomery GI...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02011-01

    Original file (02011-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HN Sartor's annex to his DD Form 4 indicates he was guaranteed "Hospital Corpsman (Five Year Obligation) Program," but not NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Sep 20 10_49_23 CDT 2000

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not all applicants are offered the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03190-99

    Original file (03190-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The program-may have been referring to is the Navy College Fund (NCF) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03895-00

    Original file (03895-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2000. Recommend the Board deny STS3 equest to add Reference Navy College Fund (NCF) Program enlistment guarantee to his master record. enlistment bonus are not eligible for the NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02211-01

    Original file (02211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 30 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. Recommend the Board deny s request to add Navy an enlistment option to NCF Program is a guarantee offered only at College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee as his master record. he is not entitled to receive NCF .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07343-00

    Original file (07343-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (DD Form 1966) informing him what enlistment guarantees he would receive and again, He also reviewed and initialed his Enlistment Contract ,made to him other than those listed on this NCF Program was not listed. lected to enroll in the MGIB Program on is entitled to receive 36 months of benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00982-01

    Original file (00982-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. master microfiche record indicates she elected Per reference A review b. Additional1 College Fund (NCF) explained to ETSN not enroll in the MGIB Program was correct. the member must be enrolled in the MGIB Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06227-01

    Original file (06227-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 Docket No: 6227-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. Consequently, to keep in mind when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members...