DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
JR E
Docket' No: 5
26 November 2001
173-00
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 16 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was unable to
locate your medical record, and based its decision on medical records provided by you, as
well as your official military personnel file.
Documentary material considered by the Board
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material-error or
injustice. The Board noted that you were voluntarily separated from the Marine Corps on 28
August 1996. There is no indication in the available records that you were unfit for duty at
that time, or that your discharge was erroneous. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
additional evidence which is probative of your unfitness for duty on 28 August 1996, or
demonstrates that your discharged was erroneous for any other reason, you should submit it.
It is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
If you have
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05898-00
(BUMED) that you It was the Naval In addition, the Board noted that as you did not have a remaining reserve obligation The Board noted that a determination of your fitness for duty and entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy is under the cognizance of Disability Evaluation System (DES), rather than the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. case if the PEB had evaluated this member, she would have been found fit for continued active duty service. from active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02685-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. no differently than others discharged under similar circum- stances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02027-01
Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the injustice. On 30 September 1986, you in connection with your pre-separation physical examination. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05838-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2006. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) denied your request for service connection for a back condition on 26 November 1996 and 18 February 2000, and for depression anda back condition on 23 October 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04703-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, on 18 April 1996 you At the time you were assigned a On 12 April 1996 the commanding officer On 3 The Board thus concluded that there is no error or The Board noted that applicable regulations require...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03437-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychiatrist anti- On 24 September 1996 you were notified of separation processing by reason of personality disorder, fraudulent enlistment, erroneous enlistment and alcohol rehabilitation failure. that you would be an outstanding member of the military and recommended that your record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07172-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That diagnosis was confirmed by a board of medical survey The Board found that you were inducted into the Marine Corps on 19 September 1950.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08664-09
”A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. On 1 October 1996 the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) reviewed that report of that examination and determined that you remained unfit | for duty due to a seizure disorder, which was ratable at 20%. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 004820-9
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02924-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We have determined the evidence in this case does not (a) which requested comments and He was discharged on The petitioner's case history, contained in reference (a), was 2. thoroughly reviewed in accordance with reference The following comments and recommendations are provided: (b) and is...