Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05064-00
Original file (05064-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 5064-00
23 October 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section

1552.

 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your  
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by  
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

NAVCRlJlTCOM memorandum 1133 Ser  

appli,cation  on 23 October 200 1. Your allegations of error and injustice

334/06479  of 1 October 2001, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an  
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RECRWTING  COMMAND

NAVY 

MILUNGlON,TENNESSEE

INTEGFU-IY  DR.
 

5722 

38054-5057

From :
To:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval

IN REPLY REFER 

To:

1133
Ser 
1
ac

/ 06479

334
t 

01

Records

Subj 

:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:

Encl:

(a) DD Form 

1966/3

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05064-00

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
1 .
applicant was authorized to reenlist as an  
Enlisted Community Manager.

Per reference (a),

E-4/YN3  by the

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05112-00

    Original file (05112-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additio?, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by a copy of which is attached. Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05271-01

    Original file (05271-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05159-00

    Original file (05159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07041-00

    Original file (07041-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 12/06437 of 23 August opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 SER 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05318-01

    Original file (05318-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRIJITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 334/06482 of 1 October 2001, a After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02433-01

    Original file (02433-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04429-01

    Original file (04429-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07350-00

    Original file (07350-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03002-01

    Original file (03002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 03002-01 10 Jul 01 00 Per references (a) Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01568-01

    Original file (01568-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per enclosure (2), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.