Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05004-01
Original file (05004-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

That Petitioner ’s naval record  
of 

25 January 200

IW 
lx~y~~-;td~  

I is in  

cc)rrcctc‘tl.  
YN.3 
(13).

 

LI~I~C’IY 

Ilocket No: 5004-01

~~ppropriate,

to show that the reenlistment

a.

That a copy of this  

IMAN

tlic 
iOr 
1 
havin&

P~~rsu;~iir to  
5.
of the Board  
723.6(e)) and  
foregoing corrective action.
the Board  

tleleg;llioil  
(‘orrcctio~l 
assui-cxd 
 

lxhll of  

on 

h~‘t 

out 

;l~itIloi~ity 
N;t\ul  

01‘ 
01’ 
c~olnpli;lnc~c 
IIII~C~I- 
t;lkLv 

ii1 
I~~~_~~rrls (32  

Section 
CYotle 

6(e) 
01‘ 
with its provisions,
tllc‘ 

authority 

01‘ 

r~l~~rc:nce (; I), 

tlw 

Sc‘c.n_‘t;t1-y  

01‘ 

IIlL- Navy .

GLU

G. I,. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

of‘ the revised Procedure

s

Fcdc1~1 
it is 

I

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07944-01

    Original file (07944-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    15.57 RECOMh4ENLIATlON: That Petitioner ’s naval record 3 January 200 effective I6 October 200 I lx~yg~xlc I is in bc 172 corrc’ctc~tl, and \\~hcre appropriate. l‘urthcr corrected to show Docket No: 7944-01 to show that the enlistment of atlv;~nce~~~t to paygrade E3 4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) Records (32 Code of Federal present at the Board record of the Board 01‘ the reviwl Rc~gulations.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02215-02

    Original file (02215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    that tlie applicable naval record be corrected to estahlisli entitlelntvt to a /onc " A " Sclcclivc Kc~enlistnient Ronus (SKH) for the M A rating. )ocu~iie~itiiry ~iiateriill consitl~,~-etl records. The Board, 11;lving reviewctl all tlic l'acts ot' rcco~-tl pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and ili~jirstice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02737-01

    Original file (02737-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2001 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2002 Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams and Harrison and Ms. Moidel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02134-02

    Original file (02134-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to tlie provisions of reference (a), Sirl~ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Hoard requesting, in effect, tliat tlie applicable naval record be corrected to show pro~noted whet1 l'irst eligible. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all tlie evidence of record, arid especially in light of tlie contents of enclosure (2), tlie Board finds the existence of an inillstice warranting the following corrective action. has been approved...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08306-01

    Original file (08306-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Ref: (a) Title IO I1.S.C’. 1533 RECOMMENDATION: lhcket No: 8306-O 1 naval record 2057) dated 23 That Petitioner ’s Form Form (DD con~~~totl 10 SIKW VEAP escc~~~c’tl Iw a h/IC;lH Election MGIB retlects that he elected to participate in tlw PrograIn and conversion period, he corrected, Fehr-mry further rellects MC;113 I983 tll;~r I on I+-ograiii. Pursuant to Records (32 Code of present...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03636-02

    Original file (03636-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 I . (:(1:yI.,i lhcket No: IO July 200 I 36X-02 5: tll),i : Rr:\‘lr5\\ 01. li)rc~goiil~ is ;i true and complet e ROJ3ERT Recorder II.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-01

    Original file (08381-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Continuoils Submarine Pay (CONSUB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Pauling, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 March 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02470-02

    Original file (02470-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370.5100 Id(‘(‘:yrj hcket No: I ‘J July 200 2 2170-02 application, applicable: statutes, opinion attacl1ed. 1‘~~rnislictl togt’llicr with all regulati~~lis by NIY‘ in:Ilc‘ri;ll ;111d polic,ics. Consequently the the applicant t I,urderi is on in.justice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04391-02

    Original file (04391-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 From: ('hi r n i i ~ t i . pllrsuant to its regulations, determined that tlie corrective action indicated Iwlow slioc~ltl he taken on tlie a\failal>le evidence of record. the Roard finds tlie existence of an i~i.justice warranting tlie following corrective action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08667-01

    Original file (08667-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Cooper, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...