DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 4456-01
23 August 2001
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 21 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 23 August 2000
at age 18.
authorities of possession of a concealed weapon, threatening
bodily harm, and underage possession of alcohol.
Thereafter, on
30 January 2001 you received an entry level separation by reason
of entry level conduct and performance.
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board concluded that your civil conviction was sufficient to
support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
Additionally, the Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is
required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to
individuals who are separated due to entry level performance and
conduct.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
On 24 January 2001 you were convicted by civil
At that time you were
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In connection with this processing, On 13 July 1999 the In your application you are requesting that your general discharge be recharacterized to honorable and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04957-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. You waived the right to respond to the On 6 June 2001 you were separated from the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction/erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05331-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07925-00
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02398-01
You were so discharged on 21 August 1987 and You did not The Board noted your contention that you have no Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous enlistment. However, the Board concluded that failure to disclose a civil conviction for rape provided sufficient justification to warrant a non-recommendation for reenlistment and assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07154-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. Given your concealment of your preservice arrest Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separation because of a fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07964-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 14 January 2000 An RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02470-01
2470-01 17 August 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 15 August 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Further facts and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06215-07
Documentary material considered by the Board Consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 November 1998, you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. Given your BCD that resulted from a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08162-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together-with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 January 1995. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.