Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04423-01
Original file (04423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 4423-01
27 December 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 27 December 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420  
of which is attached.

l/OlU 1387 of 7 December 2001, a copy

N130D 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has been denied.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

  The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

  NAV Y

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000  NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-200

0

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0
N130D1/01U1387
7 

Dee 

2001

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj

:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF AIRMAN

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#04423-01  with microfiche service record

1.

The following provides comment and recommendation on Airman

petition.

N130 recommends denial of Airman

2.
Enlistment Bonus  

(EB).

etition for an

Airman-enlisted in the Navy through the Delayed Entry

3 .
Program (DEP) on 30 April 2001 and volunteered for the Aviation
Structural Mechanics (Hydraulics) Class  
In his petition,
would allow payment of an EB.

Airman Cripe requests favorable action that

‘A"  School Guarantee.

tool  used at the

The EB program is budgeted based on

EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting  

4 .
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided by the Commander,
Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
accession seats.
EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form
addition,
sign an Agreement to Extend Enlistmen
months. Airman
in his service record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

members enrolling in other than a

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB.

does not have an EB contract nor an extension

Navy Recruiting Command and the

 

In
6 year program must

4.

 

t for a period of at least 12

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

5 .
herewith as enclosure (1).

Assistant,
Programs Branch

Enlisted Bonus



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08211-01

    Original file (08211-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-tiiember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on I8 June 2002, Your allegations of error and ill-justice were reviewed in accortlance with administrative regulations and l~rocrtlures applicable to tlie proceedings of this Board. Airman requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Airman not have an EB contract nor an extension in his -does service record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03281-01

    Original file (03281-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1’ 6 Aug 01 01LJ1200 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03281-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Challenge Program Guarantee petition, reclassification at RTC he was not offered an EB and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05907-01

    Original file (05907-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/01~1407 19 Dee 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05907-01 with microfiche service record 1. Navy Recruiting Command and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02442-02

    Original file (02442-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N 13 0 D2 22 Nov 2003 /02UO66& MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04314-01

    Original file (04314-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    his classifier could not establish whether Seaman Apprentice had ever received and EB and instructed him to petition the .an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), e Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 26 In his petition, he states that ection of Naval Records (BCNR) for an EB. Seaman Apprentice EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting 4 . does not have an EB Contract in his At no other time may a member petition for an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03204-01

    Original file (03204-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2001. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 T O IN REPLY REFER 5420 N130D1/01U1171 2 Aug 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj : OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03204-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1 . an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05042-01

    Original file (05042-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 2 October 2001 5042-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01705-01

    Original file (01705-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Delayed'Entry Program (DEP) on 21 August 1998 under a Navy Veteran (NAVET), enlisted in the ""states that he has an EB entry in his DD Form 1966 and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Petty Officer paygrade E-3 or below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07828-00

    Original file (07828-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01

    Original file (04692-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.