Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04380-01
Original file (04380-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

CRS
Docket No:   4380-01
30 November 2001

Your allegations of error and

Psychiatric evaluations, conducted on

found that you had a personality

Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 23
December 1994 at age  18.
12 January and 11 March 1996,
disorder.
statement about harming yourself.
an honorable discharge by reason of the diagnosed personality
disorder.
RE-4.
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by
regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual
separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially if
a servicemember is deemed to be a threat to herself or others.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in
your reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been
denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that

On 22 March 1996 you received
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of

The last evaluation noted that you had made a

favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to 
demons.trate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04538-01

    Original file (04538-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations -and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08665-00

    Original file (08665-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNE NA’JAL RECORD X S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 8665-00 11 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicatilon for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations and procedures applicable to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03511-02

    Original file (03511-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. normally...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08063-00

    Original file (08063-00.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when an individual is considered at risk to harm himself or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03437-01

    Original file (03437-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The psychiatrist anti- On 24 September 1996 you were notified of separation processing by reason of personality disorder, fraudulent enlistment, erroneous enlistment and alcohol rehabilitation failure. that you would be an outstanding member of the military and recommended that your record...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05322-98

    Original file (05322-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01880-01

    Original file (01880-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by the Specialty Advisory to the Surgeon General for Psychiatry, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and a copy of which is attached. * The Board found that on 10 November 1994 you enlisted in the Navy 'The record reflects that on 27 February 1995, while at age 18. under...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08381-02

    Original file (08381-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07493-01

    Original file (07493-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The medical record shows that you However, there is no Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated based on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06902-02

    Original file (06902-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...