DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No:
15 April 1999
5322-98
.
Dea
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record reflects that on 17 May 1996 you received
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 August 1995
at age 18.
A psychiatric
nonjudicial punishment for insubordination.
evaulation, conducted on 23 May 1996, diagnosed you with a
personality disorder.
a general discharge by reason of a diagnosed personality
disorder.
RE-4.
At that time you were assigned a reenlistment code of
Subsequently, on 31 July 1996 you received
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by
regulatory guidance and often assigned to individuals separated
especially if they have
due to diagnosed personality disorders,
It means that you may not reenlist in the
disciplinary action.
Navy without prior approval of the Commander, Navy Personnel
Command.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
since you did not ask for such
service should be changed,
consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05532-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 15 April 1996 at age 19. At that time you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07235-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02175-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2003. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed since you did not request such action and you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge and Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06116-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3G reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to diagnosed personality disorders. that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10471-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a personality disorder. The Board did not consider whether the characterization of service or reason for your separation should be changed, since you did not ask for such consideration and you have not exhausted your administrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03502-02
discharge by reason of personality disorder, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use However, it cannot change a NDRB is Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02161-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08034-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05858 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2012. On 10 December 1999, you were discharged with a general characterization of service due to your diagnosed personality disorder and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08665-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNE NA’JAL RECORD X S WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 8665-00 11 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicatilon for correction of your A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations and procedures applicable to the...