DEPARTMENT OF
THE: NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC
2037C-5100
JRE
Docket No: 4214-00
13 June 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
three-member.panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
A
session, considered your application on 31 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
accordan?e with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
were reviewed in
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you entered on active duty in
thl: Naval Reserve on 8 February 1985.
On 11 March 1985, a medical board gave you a diagnosis of paranoia, existed prior to entry,
not service aggravated. You were discharged by reason of erroneous
enliitment on 25 march
1985, because of your failure to meet the minimum physical standards for enlistment.
The Board was unable to conclude that your pre-existing mental disorder was aggravated by
your brief period of active service. Accordingly, you: application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be
I’urnished upon request.
such that favorable action cannot be
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
11
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error
injustice.
or
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07559-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. In a letter dated 29 November 1999, a psychiatrist with a Louisiana State University student health center stated that you had an organic mental disorder with depression and a personality disorder, both secondary to a severe head injury you suffered as a teenager. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05402-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 August 1985. On 3 December 1985, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07097-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2009. the knee condition, and recommended that you be discharged without entitlement to disability benefits administered by the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12082-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your disability was aggravated by your service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05830-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ing and assistance center determined that you were still not drug dependent and scheduled you for a four week outpatient course, beginning in March 1985. tested positive again for marijuana use on an aftercare urinalysis. not heed the warning that further drug abuse could result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00101-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05835-01
factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of the discharge given your record of five The Board noted the aggravating factor that you waived your right to an ADB, the one opportunity you had to show why you should be retained or discharged under honorable conditions. much misconduct in only 23 months of service to warrant recharacterization to honorable or under honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05444-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2001. There is no indication in the available records that you were unfit by reason of a physical disability incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4061 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00875-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge on 11 December...