Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05830-01
Original file (05830-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

ELP
Docket No. 5830-01
14 December 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for-correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
12 December 2001.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

considered your application on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 25 September 1981 for four years at
age 18.
The record reflects that you were advanced to SM2 (E-5)
and served without incident until 6 April 1984 when you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for wrongful possession of a
cartridge flare and use of marijuana.
Punishment consisted of
forfeitures of $389 per month for two months, reduction in rate
to 
Thereafter, you were formally counseled regarding your use of
marijuana and warned that failure to take corrective action could
result in administrative discharge.
A medical evaluation found
that you were a drug abuser,

SM3 (E-4), and 45 days of restriction and extra duty.

but not drug dependent.

On 18 June 1984 you were placed in an outpatient level I
rehabilitation program which included weekly counseling, alcohol
and drug abuse classes,
27 July 1984 you tested positive for marijuana on a  
tation/aftercare urinalysis.

rehabili-
After a comprehensive review of

and weekly urinalysis testing. On

your record, the command made a determination to retain you and
On 5 October 1984, the counsel-
furnish further rehabilitation.
ing and assistance center determined that you were still not drug
dependent and scheduled you for a four week outpatient course,
beginning in March 1985.
tested positive again for marijuana use on an aftercare
urinalysis.

However, on 21 December 1984, you

On 4 February 1985 you were notified that discharge under other
than honorable conditions was being initiated by reason of
misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by three incidents

 of
drug use in nine months and drug abuse rehabilitation failure as
evidenced by two drug incidents while in a rehabilitation

elected,to  submit a statement in

You were advised of your procedural rights, and after

program.
consulting with legal counsel,
your own behalf but waived the right to present your case to an
In your statement, you
administrative discharge board  
opined that your professional performance rated a discharge
higher than under other than honorable conditions.
your record of performance which included a meritorious
advancement and a promotion under the command advancement
program, a letter of appreciation for outstanding performance,
and superior performance during a ship's exercise and as
divisional leading petty officer.

You cited

(ADB).

On 13 February 1985 the commanding officer recommended discharge
under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due
to drug abuse.
excellent, your statement did not discuss your drug use or
whether you intended to stop using marijuana in conformance with
the Navy's zero tolerance policy.

He noted that although your performance was

The record reflects two periods of unauthorized absence (UA) from
14-15 February and 21-28 February 1985,
disciplinary action.
Personnel directed discharge under other than honorable
conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
so discharged on 8 March 1985.

While you were UA, the Chief of Naval

for which you received no

You were

On 25 January 1999, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB)
denied your request for an upgrade of your discharge.

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity,
the more than two years of unblemished service in which your were
promoted to SM2, the issues you presented to the NDRB, and the
fact that it has been more than 15 years since you were
discharged.
insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
given your use of drugs for which you received an NJP.
You
received significant consideration when the command elected to

The Board concluded that these factors were

2

However, you failed to learn from the NJP and did

retain you.
not heed the warning that further drug abuse could result in
admini-strative discharge.
Your continued use of marijuana
demonstrated a willful disregard of the Navy's zero tolerance
policy and set a poor example for your subordinates and peers.
The Board also noted the aggravating factor that you waived an
ADB the one opportunity you had to show why you should be
retained or discharged under honorable conditions.
concluded that the discharge was proper and no change is
warranted.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

The Board
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken..
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption  of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2474-13

    Original file (NR2474-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00130

    Original file (ND00-00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :841004: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use marijuana on 30Aug84, as evidenced by a positive urinalysis test. A summary courts-martial was held on 21 June 1985 on applicant for altering the message from the Navy Drug Lab with the results from the urinalysis held on 2 May 1985.850717: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana use, less than monthly May 1985, ashore off duty. After a thorough review of the records,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00126

    Original file (ND99-00126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00126 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981028, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. CAAC found applicant not dependent and recommended Level I treatment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00968

    Original file (ND99-00968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    921208: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, recommended applicant be retained. 950407: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00194

    Original file (ND01-00194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Thank you for you time, please once again review my record of the 4 years I put into my country - thank you once again. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board recognizes that serving in the Navy is very challenging to both the Sailor and his family members. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6905 13

    Original file (NR6905 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR787 13

    Original file (NR787 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01327

    Original file (ND02-01327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01327 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020917, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 871214: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by two positive urinalysis tests while on 4X6 urinalysis aftercare program; and misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09560-06

    Original file (09560-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 2 October 1984 you enlisted in the Navy at age 20. You subsequently attended a substance abuse...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05402-08

    Original file (05402-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A wanee-menber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 25 September 1985 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.