DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 4054-01
13 June 2001
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Ref:
Encl:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Series of Documents
(3) Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show Petitioner’s S-EAOS as 4 January 2003.
2. The Board, consisting of Mses. McCormick, Wiley, and Mr.
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 June 2001 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Leeman, reviewed
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
(2)‘, the Board finds the existence of an
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a. The Personnel-on-Line-Listing will reflect Petitioner
’s S-EAOS as “4 January 2003 ”
2004 ”. Petitioner enlisted on 5 January 1998 for 4 years for the Hospital
vice “4 January
Corpsman School Guarantee Program and executed a 12 month extension on
6 February 1998 making his S-EAOS 4 January 2004.
b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
13 June 2001
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06625-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of enlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04838-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04602-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. .- Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06154-01
The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No: 6154-01 a. He had previously received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07991-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 7991-02 10 December 2002 From: To: urn 1160 Ser 81 l/452 of 13 November 2002 1. ched as enclosure titioner’s application has commented to the effect that the (2), the office having cognizance over the CONCLUSION Upon review and considerat.on of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06975-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the term of reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01097-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bartlett, Beckett, and Mimer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 May 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04599-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his EAOS as 28 July 2000, with an SEAOS of 28 July 2001. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07585-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07107-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an extension. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...