DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 6154-01
8 January 2002
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj
Ref:
Encl:
(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 18 October 2001
(3) Subject ’s naval record
1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to cancel a reenlistment.
2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
Docket No: 6154-01
a. The 4 year reenlistment executed on or about 4 July
will revert to 15 February
2003.
2001 is null and void. EAOS
b. Member was erroneously approved for a zone
“A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus
(SRB). He had previously received a bonus for the reenlistment executed on 16 February
1999 and service members may receive only one zone “A” SRB.
C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner
’s naval record.
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
.
. %?DY
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
8 January 2002
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09807-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. b. : Paragraph 8b (Remarks) line 2 of the DD Form 4/1 (Oct: 2007) executed on or about 22 August 2008, is modified to read “REENLISTED FOR THE FOLLOWING INCENTIVE(S): ZONE “A” SRBP $34,500 MOS 6154." c. This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB for MOS 6154, which is capped at $34,500 for 48 months of additional obligated service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08631-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Member was erroneously approved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07614-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone OS rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06821-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone GSM rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07100-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone OS rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07947-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5326. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05968-01
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 5968-01 8 January 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to Bonus (SRB) for NEC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08058-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY 2 ANNEX DC 20370-510 WASHINGTON S 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 15 January 2002 8058-01 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 8 11 of 4 December 2001 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07078-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5342. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06142-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTM rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...