DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 3598-01
20 September 2001
Your allegations of error and
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 September 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious'consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for
six years on 19 May 1998.
contract required you to participate in 48 drills and perform 14
days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year.
On 3 April
reported for initial ACDUTRA on 8 September 1998.
1999 you were released from active duty and assigned to a Marine
Corps Reserve Unit.
On 8 March 2000 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
unsatisfactory participation due to failure to attend regularly
When
scheduled drills in October, November, and December 1999.
informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive your right
After
to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and on 8 May 2000 you received an other
than honorable discharge.
In
In this regard, your enlistment
You
its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
.
However, the
The Board noted the record reflects that you
This
The
such as your youth and immaturity
potentially mitigating factors,
and the contention that you had medical problems.
Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant
your reinstatement.
failed to attend scheduled drills over a three month period of
time, and you have submitted no evidence to the contrary.
failure was sufficient to warrant an other than honorable
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
discharge.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03943-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. discharge authority, the recommendation for approved and on 7 January 1999 you received honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03489-03
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 22 December 2000 you were discharged with an other than honorable At that time, you were assigned a reenlistment code discharge. In fact, you were not recommended Concerning your request to change the RE-4 reenlistment code, as a drilling reservist you should not have a reenlistment code. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05122-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 20 March 1998 you were discharged with an other than honorable At that time you were assigned a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03063-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05852-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In this regard, your enlistment You On 30 November When informed of the recommendation, you elected to You received a general discharge from At that time you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05086-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. Under the terms of your enlistment contract, you were required to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00414-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2008. On 19 February 1986 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03862-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive your right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03039-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. On 21 August 1985 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the USMCR with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to your failure to attend regularly scheduled drills. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...