Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03780-01
Original file (03780-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC

 

20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 3780-01
1 August 2001

From:
To:
Subj:

Ref:
Encl:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

VAL RECORD OF

(a) 10 U.S.C.  1552
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be
corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the
undesirable discharge issued on 15 June 1955.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and
George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

c. Petitioner reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 2 August 1950
after more than two years of prior active service.
He served in
Korea and was awarded the Purple Heart, Korean Service Medal with
two bronze service stars,

and the Presidential Unit Citation.
d. The record reflects that he received four nonjudicial

punishments and was convicted by four summary courts-martial.
The offenses included unauthorized absences 

totalling seven days,

breaking restriction on two occasions, willful disobedience of a
lawful order, and failure to obey a lawful order.

e. On 4 April 1955 the commanding officer recommended that he

The discharge authority approved the recommendation
Petitioner was so discharged on 15 June 1955.

be separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of
unfitness.
and directed that an undesirable discharge be issued by reason of
unfitness.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
In this regard, the Board notes Petitioner's numerous
disciplinary actions but, since they were relatively minor in
nature, believes that they did not warrant the severe
characterization that he received.
Further, Petitioner was
awarded the Purple Heart and served in Korea during two campaigns
against the enemy.
that the discharge should be recharacterized to general.
In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes

the Board finds the existence of an

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
was issued a general discharge by reason of unfitness on 15 June
1955 vice the undesirable discharge issued on that date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

C . That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be informed
that Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 7 May
2001.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

P

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

-

h+

7
E. GOLDSMITH

/

 

Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

G-

 

DEAN PFEIFFER

w.
Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01216-99

    Original file (01216-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 22 July 1971. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and Petitioner was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 22 July 1971. He would like to have his discharge CONCLUSION: Upon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01801-05

    Original file (01801-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr., Mr.and Mr., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show he was separated with an honorable discharge on 3 August 1954 and that he was recommended for reenlistment, vice the under honorable conditions discharge and the non-recommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03754-01

    Original file (03754-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 23 June 1953. Thereafter, the commanding officer He was e. On 2 June 1953 an administrative discharge board convened in the Bureau of Naval Personnel and recommended an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness. (e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01582-01

    Original file (01582-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the separation under honorable conditions and the subsequent general discharge. A retired Marine colonel states that Petitioner is a good citizen and he believes an injustice was done in this case. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10024-07

    Original file (10024-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, applied to this Board requesting that his discharge be upgraded. His last act of misconduct which resulted in his receiving an undesirable discharge (UD) occurred on 14 september 1954 when he was convicted by civil authorities of being a “peeping tom.” CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that as a matter clemency Petitioner’s request for an upgrade of his UD should be granted. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06155-01

    Original file (06155-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6165-01 29 November 2001 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge on 12 January 1948. Naval Personnel approved the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06803-00

    Original file (06803-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Corps officials with the authority to involuntarily separate those service members who commit a homosexual act or acts. Based upon Petitioner's overall record of service and current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference its radical departure from the policy which was in effect on 9 May 1955, the date of Petitioner's discharge, the Board concludes that it would be in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07301-01

    Original file (07301-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    7301-01 16 May 2002 Chairman, Secretary of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records From: To: Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps applied to this Board requesting, in effect, show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 4 March 1955. that his naval record be corrected to The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04398-10

    Original file (04398-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geberth, Pfeiffer, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Therefore, on 21 October 1949, he was separated with a UD and was not recommended for reenlistment. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a general discharge vice the UD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03753-01

    Original file (03753-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 20 May 1968. procedural rights and waived the right to present his case to an Thereafter, the CO recommended administrative discharge board. In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner had disciplinary actions during more than two years of...