Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01216-99
Original file (01216-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
Y
DEPARTMENTOFTHENAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No: 1216-99
29 August 2000

From:
To:

Subj:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

L RECORD OF

Ref:

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1)
with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be
corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the
undesirable discharge issued on 22 July 1971.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr.
Morgan, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 23 August 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

C . Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 6 March 1968 at

At that time he had completed ten years of formal

age 18.
It appears that he served in Vietnam from 31 July
education.
1968 to 18 March 1969, participated in 16 operations, and was
awarded three Purple Hearts.

d. The record reflects that after returning from Vietnam,

Petitioner received three nonjudicial punishments and was
convicted by two summary courts-martial.

The offenses included

failure to obey a lawful order on two occasions, disrespect on
three occasions, dereliction of duty, resisting arrest, breach of
the peace by engaging in a fight,
changing the rifle custody index card.

losing a M-14 rifle and

e. On 28 April 1971 an administrative discharge board

recommended that Petitioner be separated with an undesirable
discharge by reason of unfitness.
authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and
Petitioner was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 22
July 1971.

After review by the discharge

f. Petitioner admits to his misconduct and states he was young

and immature at the time.
upgraded for the benefit of his children.

He would like to have his discharge

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action as a matter of clemency,
Vietnam.
Purple Hearts, combat record,
Vietnam.
of recharacterization to general is appropriate.

The Board particularity relies on the award of three
and unblemished service while in
Consequently, the Board finds that relief in the form

based on his record of service in

In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

the Board finds the existence of an

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he

was issued a general discharge by reason of unfitness on 22 July
1971, vice the undesirable discharge actually issued on that
date.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

C . That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be informed

that Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 17
February 1999.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations,
and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Acting Recorder

2

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08505-00

    Original file (08505-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlistment member of the United States Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 23 March 1971. considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02747-05

    Original file (02747-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    2. e Board, consisting of Mr. UI~I Mr. and Mr. • reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 October 2005, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The separation authority subsequently approved his request and he was so discharged on 29 June 1970. However, the Board considered Petitioner’s service in Vietnam, the injuries and other medical problems that apparently resulted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03753-01

    Original file (03753-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 20 May 1968. procedural rights and waived the right to present his case to an Thereafter, the CO recommended administrative discharge board. In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner had disciplinary actions during more than two years of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06281-02

    Original file (06281-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 21 July 1977. In this regard, benefits would only been granted if the discharges were recharacterized using traditional standards by the discharge review boards or the boards for correction of military records. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09221-02

    Original file (09221-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    % Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 'The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner's all 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. h. On 19 January 1971, while serving in Vietnam, Petitioner submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for a six day period of UA, and disobeying a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03780-01

    Original file (03780-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 15 June 1955. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01057-07

    Original file (01057-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 01057-07 28 January 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER wgpieeiaielenaae REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04690-99

    Original file (04690-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were so discharged on 15 July The commanding officer noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a careful search of your service and medical records for any evidence showing you were wounded in action while serving in Vietnam. you were transferred from Vietnam, request to CMC to see if you were reported to have been wounded in action on 26 March 1966. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021730

    Original file (20090021730.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The psychiatrist recommended the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability. Given the circumstances in this case, the applicant's discharge was inequitable for the following reasons: * he served 4 years, 1 month, and 4 days of creditable service * he served in Vietnam for 1 year, 8 months, and 27 days * he was twice wounded and twice cited for meritorious service * he was promoted to SSG/E-6 in three short years * from 30 November 1966 to 7 May...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03368-98

    Original file (03368-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the undesirable discharge issued on 4 June 1970. The Board, consisting of Mr. Kastner, Ms. Hare and Ms. Wiley, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...