Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03742-01
Original file (03742-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

HD:hd
Docket No: 03742-01
29 June 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

“Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

JR.
c o

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 dtd 5 May 01 w/attachments
(2) PERS-85 memo dtd 15 Jun 01
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to change the acceptance date (effective date for pay) of his original appointment as
a limited duty officer 
13 March 2001 to 1 October 2000.

(LDO), U. S. Navy, in the grade of lieutenant (junior grade) from

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. 
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 June 2001, and pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Novello and Ms. Moidel, reviewed

McPartlin and 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s 
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

dlegkons

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

In correspondence attached as enclosure 

(NPC)
office with cognizance over the subject matter of this case has commented to the effect that
Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants favorable action.

(2), the Navy Personnel Command 

b.

.

.‘=’ 

:/q 

.y 

(. 

/

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of
contents of enclosure 
(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

the

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show the

acceptance date (effective date for pay) of his original appointment as an LDO, U. S. Navy,
( in the grade of lieutenant (junior grade) as 1 October 

2CKMJ, vice 13 March 2001.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an appropriate location in
Petitioner ’s naval record, and that another copy of this report be returned to this Board,
together with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner
confidential file maintained for such purpose.

’s record, for retention in a

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

8, 

fl&+.&%

,-:44 
JONATHAN S. 
Acting Recorder

RUSKIN

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

~~. &&_ .
w-,_ W. DEAN PFEIFFER

Executive Director

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

5420
PERS-85
15 Jun  01

MEMORANDUM FOR BCNR

Via:

BUPERS/BCNR Coordinator

,

Subj:

LTJ

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

JR., USN,

1 .
LTJ

Enclosure (1) is returned,

recommending approval of

request to backdate his effective date of rank.

tleQ

Ott 

O(P.

LTJ

date of rank is 1  

2.
Officer Acceptance and Oath of Office (NAVPERS  
deployment, which he never received.
made several attempts to obtain and sign an oath, yet was unable
to until 13 Mar 01.
administrative problem occurred within the mail system,
recommend to support his request.

As it is quite possible that the

It is apparent that he

He was sent an

1000/4) while on

Recommend that L

3.
changed to 01 

Ott

00.

effective date of rank be

“.l
BCNR Liaison, Officer Promotions
and Enlisted Advancements Division



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00077-01

    Original file (00077-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show 19 vice 20 December 1998 in blocks 14 (permanent grade date) and 16 (present grade date) of his Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office (NAVCRUIT commission as an ensign in the Naval Reseve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Shy and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08250-98

    Original file (08250-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his date of rank in the grade of lieutenant as 19 August 1976 vice 20 May 1972. Counsel insisted that Petitioner’s lieutenant date of rank should be corrected as requested, to allow him to complete 30 years of service in fiscal year 2007. Accordingly, counsel requested, ’ in the event...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00618-01

    Original file (00618-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 HD:hd Docket No: 00618-01 13 April 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: C D REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD MSC, US Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05855-01

    Original file (05855-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 01 Active Duty Line Commander Selection Board, vice the FY 02 Active Duty Line Commander Selection Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06883-01

    Original file (06883-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing her lieutenant date of rank and effective date from 1 May 2001 to 1 February 2001; and that her lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, allegations of error and injustice on 8 November 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00083-01

    Original file (00083-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to change the acceptance date (effective date for pay) of his original appointment as a limited duty officer (LDO) in the grade of captain from 4 December 2000 to 1 November 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Pfeiffer and Taylor, reviewed Petitioner’s , and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07873-01

    Original file (07873-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 DD Form 149 dtd 10 PERS-86 memo dtd 19 Apr 01 Subject’s naval record Ott 01 w/attachments Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of commander he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 01 Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06332-01

    Original file (06332-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    October 2001, and pursuant to its Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommending approval of i .$b administrative and BCNR actions were completed on 30 March as granted a record correction by BCNR.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06129-00

    Original file (06129-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No: 06129-00 20 July 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LCDR REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD c, us Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07688-02

    Original file (07688-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected that to show that he did not fail of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2002 Active Reserve Major Selection Board. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McBride, allegations of error and injustice on 7 November 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...