Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03735-01
Original file (03735-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

Docket No:  
21 August 2001

3735-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proc,eedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 12 July 2001, a copy of which
is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

c

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

NAVY 

PERSONNEL COMMAN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN  

38055-0000

Y

D

1780
PERS-604
12 Jul 01

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOZCB)

(a) CNPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 14 Jun 01
(b) Title 38,

United States Code, Chapter 30

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a):

a.

Recommend the Board deny

equest to enroll

in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.
Enrollment/Disenrollment  Form (DD Form 2366) is the official
form used to document a servicemember's decision to enroll or
disenroll in the MGIB Program.
to disenroll is irrevocable.

Per reference (b), the decision

The MGIB

b.

Illinois before signing

Recruits opting not to enroll in the MGIB

each recruit is provided an opportunity to reverse

It is standard procedure that all recruits be thoroughly
briefed on the MGIB Program during the first week of training at
Recruit Training Command, Great Lakes,
their DD Form 2366.
Program are counseled individually to ensure they fully
understand the provisions of the MGIB Program.
counseling,
their decision before the DD Form 2366 becomes part of the
A review of AA
master record.
indicates he elected to disenro
12 April 2000.
was properly briefed on the provisions of the MGIB Program and
given ample opportunity to change his decision while in recruit
training.
support his claim for relief.
the MGIB Program are documented on the DD Form 2366 that
AA Barton signed on 12 April 2000.

No counseling inconsistencies exist that would

It is the opinion of this office that

Additionally,

aster microfiche record
e MGIB Program on

the provisions of

After

Subj:

PERS-604's point of contact is Mr.

2.
reached at (DSN) 882-4246 or  

(C)

901-874-4246.

who can be

Commander, U.S. Navy
Director,
Navy Drug 
Behavioral Health, Federal
Education,
& Partnerships
Division (PERS-60)

& Alcohol,



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01943-01

    Original file (01943-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 12 June 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02011-01

    Original file (02011-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. HN Sartor's annex to his DD Form 4 indicates he was guaranteed "Hospital Corpsman (Five Year Obligation) Program," but not NCF Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02460-02

    Original file (02460-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Board. Program record accordingly. PERS-604 has corrected This was apparently an erroneous entry He may have received this information ce, Denver has for MGIB Program electronic MGIB money was collected for Accoun fro c. W declined enrollment in the MGIB Program in writing on 29 March 1991 and no money was collected for enrollment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07002-01

    Original file (07002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. I request to enroll in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02563-02

    Original file (02563-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 Pers 604 of 2 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02527-01

    Original file (02527-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06227-01

    Original file (06227-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 Docket No: 6227-01 30 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the IJnited States Code, section 1552. Consequently, to keep in mind when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05093-01

    Original file (05093-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is important iil_justice. offered only at the discretion of the classifier, not the field If NCF Program funding and quotas are exhausted at recruiter. he is not entitled to receive NCF Program e annex to his DD Form 4 a Since the documents c initiale evident A review of 2. elected to enroll in Montgomery GI...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05458-01

    Original file (05458-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend the Board deny HMCS Suyat's request to enroll Per entered the VEAP was available to members who in the Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). references (c) and (d) for members like HMCS Suyat who did not participate in VEAP. DD Form 2057 was used to document member's election to In some cases, members The DD Form 2057 submitted by enroll-or decline enrollment in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03055-01

    Original file (03055-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP: ddj Docket No: 31 July 2001 3055-01 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Recommend the Board deny EM3 m$request to add Navy College Fund (NCF) Program guarantee to his master as well as the Enlistment Bonus (EB) NCF Program, record. is an enlistment incentive program...