DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 3380-01
19 September 2001
From:
To:
Subj:
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy
AL RECORD 0
I
Ref:
(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl:
(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Navy,
Board requesting, in effect,
that his naval record be corrected
by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 29 April 1998.
filed enclosure (1) with this
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Adams, and Cooper,
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12
September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:
Documentary material considered by
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
C . Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 8 April 1998 at age 21.
At the time of enlistment he had completed twelve years of formal
education.
d. A psychiatric evaluation,
conducted on 21 April 1998, found
that Petitioner had a severe character and behavior disorder.
Specifically, his shipmates were afraid of him since he wandered
around at night, peering at them while they were sleeping.
e. On 23 April 1998 the commanding officer directed that
Petitioner receive an entry level separation based on a psychotic
He waived all rights, including the right
personality disorder.
On 29 April 1998 he received an entry
to consult with counsel.
level separation by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder.
At that time Petitioner was assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
f. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of either an
RE-3G or RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual discharged due
to a physical or mental condition such as a personality disorder.
g- In his application, Petitioner contends that he was not
or spiritually prepared for military
mentally, physically,
service.
attesting to his good character from his pastor and one of his
college professors.
In support of his application, he has submitted letters
CONCLUSION:
The Board notes Petitioner's admission that he was not
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
prepared for recruit training.
However, the Board believes that
while Petitioner would stare at sleeping fellow shipmates, he was
only having adjustment problems.
aware that changing the reenlistment code from RE-4 to RE-3G will
not require that Petitioner be reenlisted, and he will have to
convince recruiting authorities that he is mentally fit to serve.
Accordingly, the Board believes that the RE-4 reenlistment code
should now be changed to RE-3G.
Additionally, the Board is
In view of the foregoing,
injustice warranting the following corrective action.
the Board finds the existence of an
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on
29 April 1998, Petitioner was assigned an RE-3G reenlistment code
instead of the RE-4 reenlistment code actually assigned.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.
C . That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
together with a copy of
naval record be returned to the Board,
this Report of Proceedings,
maintained for such purpose,
part of Petitioner's naval record.
for retention in a confidential file
with no cross reference being made a
2
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder
&
ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
Executive Director
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04930-01
4930-01 19 November 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. On 24 November e. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3G or RE- 4 reenlistment code to individual...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07076-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 25 June 2008. The Board concludes that the reentry code RE-3G, should now be assigned since his record does not warrant the most stigmatizing reentry code of RE-4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 25 June 2008, he was assigned an RE-3G reentry code instead of the RE-4 reentry code actually assigned...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02968-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting changes in the reason for discharge and reenlistment code. The discharge i. Petitioner provides copies of Evaluation Reports from March 1996 through June 1998 which show he was consistently marked as "Meets Standards" (3.0) or The evaluation report submitted upon separation was not provided by Petitioner and presumably was adverse, and no longer recommended him for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10921-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR ‘Docket No: 10921-08 20 October ‘2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD ‘Ossi hey Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. A Sailor separated for this reason may also receive an RE-4 reenlistment code, which means that the individual is not recommended for reenlistment. Nonetheless, the Board concludes that Petitioner's narrative reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09100-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. 2 reviewed Petitioner's allegations o injustice on 12 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, , determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07905-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTiON OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100TJRDocket No: 7905-07 April 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVI NAVAL RECORD OF___ -Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of her discharge be upgraded and her reenlistment code changed.2. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02216-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370~5 100 SJNDocket No: 2216-0715 February 2008From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U. S.C. 1552End: (1) Case Summary (2) Subjects naval record1. The Board, consisting of Mr. ____ / Mr. and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09774-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reason for discharge (personality disorder) and RE-3G reenlistment code be changed. The evaluation recommended an expeditious administrative separation due to a personality disorder that existed prior to his enlistment. Ten months later, on 10 May 2006, his commanding officer issued him a counseling/warning concerning his diagnosed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01820-11
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1820-11 96 April 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy OF NAVAL RECORD ae Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 18 April 1995. Pfeiffer, Ivins, and Blanchard, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10126-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS I 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 FC Document No: 10126- 02 28 April 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: EVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iUmUINII~IIflIfhIhIIIIEUiIIiihhjUIhii~iiqimU~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Petitioner’s conduct and overall trait averages were 3.25 and 3.2 respectively at the time of his discharge. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form...