DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC
20370.5100
SMC
Docket No: 03307-01
14 November 2001
Dear First Ser
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to
the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. You requested removal
of the
~
Director, Depot Schools letter 1500 DI SCOL dated 28 October 1988 and the NAVGRAM
dated 15 November 1988.
.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 November 2001. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board
considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated
22 May and 13 June 2001, copies of which are attached.
all material submitted in support thereof, your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinions. They found the removal of your fitness report for 3 October to
2 November 1988 by the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board did not, in itself,
support removing the documents at issue. In view of the above, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosures
-
‘_a .
.7
3c
DEPARTMENT
EACQUARTERS
OF THE
UNITED STATES
ROAO
2212445102
VIRGINIA
NAW
M-2 CC
3280 RUSSELL
QUANTICC.
)‘EMORJiNDUM
FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD
:=3
Subj:
PETITION OF FIRST SERGEANT
We have carefully reviewed Fir
1.
disapproval for removal of requested
docu
and recommend
owing reasons:
ocuments that are requested to
ord were in his Official
for promotion to First Sergeant.
competitive for selection to Sergeant Major
hindered him from being selected for Serge
hinder him from being selected to First Se
Militazy
Lf removed from First Sergeant
2ersonnel File (OMPF) when he
KC_ believe that had he been
:?.oss documents would not have
ust as they did not
2.
Point of contact is Sergeant,
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE
3280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103
CORI-a
IN REPLY REFER TO:
100 0
MMEA
13 Jun 01
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
PETITION OF FI
We have carefully reviewed First
Sergea.
1.
disapproval for removal of requested docume
C
quest and recommend
lowing reasons:
a.
We recommend the documents stay in First
Sergea
The documents are factual events that occurred between
November 1988 and are not bias in nature.
there would be no record of his disenrollment of Drill Instructor School.
If these documents were removed
,PF-
and 15
2.
Point of contact is Sergeant
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03973-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lg (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) counseling entry dated 12 July 1999. (5), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page llg (“Adarministrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07499-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2002. Staff Sergeant application with supporting documents has been ncerning his request for removal of the sensitive medical documentation contained in his official military personnel files (OMPF). Staff medical documentation contained in his OMPF.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01263-01
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 lb (“Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 23 February 2000. The Automated n Since your request to remove the Page 11 entry does not 3. fall under the purview of this Headquarters, your case will be forwarded to the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) for resolution 0 to that agency a lease direct further inquiries HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08381-00
The petitioner has offered absolutely no documentary that he missed only six hours of class Finally, while paragraph nine of enclosure (5) to evidence whatsoever to prove his allegations that his absences were due to medical reasons or that the report itself contains "false statements" (i.e., vice 60). The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists specific deficiencies and recommendations for corrective found, and states that Sergeant to make a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08259-01
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 2 November 2001 with enclosure, the advisory opinion from the HQMC Manpower Management Information Systems Division (MIFD), dated 11 December 2001 with enclosure, and the memorandum for the record dated 23 January 2002, copies of which are attached. The following comments/opinions concerning the page 11 entry 6 . on the Marine's grade, experience, position,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06262-00
The attached memorandum for the record dated 12 January 2001 reflects that this code has been removed. In addition, the Board (PERB), considered the report of the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board 8 December 2000, a copy of which is attached. 103 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) HE CASE OF STAFF SMC .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01886-00
Removal of the following fitness reports was requested: a. b. The case is forwarded for fin Colonel, U.S. Marine Corps Deputy Director Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-510 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 5354 MPE ---, .i MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE NAVAL RECORDS DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF Subj: REVIEW...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06813-02
Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY SERGEANT E CASE OF STAFF MC 5. MC0 P5354.1C, Marine MC0 1610.12, the U.S. 3 . The counseling entry meets the elements of a proper page 11 counseling in that it lists deficiencies, recommendations for corrective action, and states that Staff opportunity to make a rebutta Additionally, the entry affords him an opportunity to annotate whether or not he desires to make such a statement and if made, a copy of the statement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02098-00
Your request to enter a “CD” (change of duty) fitness report for 9 March to 10 April 1991, reflecting service in combat with the primary duty of adjutant, could not be considered, as you did not provide such a report. the Reporting Senior's actions in 3c is in no way an invalidating factor in Reference (b) did not contain a very filling out Item 3c and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08305-00
MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR SMC adverse report at the time the report is prepared. 1610 MMER/PERB 6 ; OEC MU MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) TION IN THE CASE OF USMC (a) (b) DD Form 149 of 7 Sep 00 Ch l-6 Per 1. with three members present, MC0 161O.llC, the Performance Evaluation Review...