Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02932-01
Original file (02932-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 2932-01
13eAugust 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER  
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

334/06373  of 18 June 2001, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE

380546057

IN REPLY REFER 

To:

1133
Ser  
18  Jun 0 1

334/06373

From:
To:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:

(a) PHONCON BUPERS  
COMNAVCRUITCOM 

(N132Dl)  
(N31226)  

AFCM(SW)w
YN3B.of  7 Jun 01

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 02932-01

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
applicant's request to reenlist as an  
due to overmanning.
PRAN/E-3.

Applicant was authorized to reenlist as an

Per reference (a),
ABH3/E-4  was disapproved

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records

only.

Enclosure

(1)

is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05159-00

    Original file (05159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03054-01

    Original file (03054-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05112-00

    Original file (05112-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additio?, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by a copy of which is attached. Correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02861-01

    Original file (02861-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02184-01

    Original file (02184-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. applicant was authorized to reenlist as an Per reference (a), CTM2/E-5 was disapproved Applicant's experience gained CTM2/E-5.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03856-01

    Original file (03856-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. applicant's request to reenlist as an (21, Per references (a) AME3/E-4 Applicant was This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07268-01

    Original file (07268-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02345-01

    Original file (02345-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 02345-01 applicant is non prior Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03002-01

    Original file (03002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 03002-01 10 Jul 01 00 Per references (a) Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 3203-01

    Original file (3203-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.