Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05104-99
Original file (05104-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 

NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 5104-99
13 June 2000

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Ref:

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) CMC memorandum 1040 CMT of 2 May 2000
(3) Subject ’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show that on his enlistment he was assigned a date of rank based on his prior
service.

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Hardbower, Madison, and Mr. Pfeiffer, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 June 2000 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated  below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

In correspondence attached as enclosure  

(2), the office having cognizance over the

b.

subject matter addressed in Petitioner ’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

(2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

 

of’the

t

Docket No: 5104-99

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a. On Petitioner’s enlistment of 12
” 12 February

” 18 September 1997 ” vice 
from this action.)

February 1999 he was assigned a date of rank as
1999”. (NOTE: No monetary value would accrue

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures

5.
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

13 June 2000



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00764-00

    Original file (00764-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure by the Fiscal Year requested that his record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected by the FY 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY Selection Board. d. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03044-99

    Original file (03044-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of lieutenant colonel he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 1999 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, vice the FY 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08026-99

    Original file (08026-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in of college credit hours.. paygrade E3 based on the completion of the required number 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05542-99

    Original file (05542-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Chapman, and Ms. Schnittman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 31 May regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06347-99

    Original file (06347-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) (3) Subject ’s naval record NAVCRUCOM memorandum 1133 SER 3434/06133 of 11 January 2000 Pursuant to the provisions of reference 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher number of college credit hours. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08044-99

    Original file (08044-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade.. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner 2. allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00187-99

    Original file (00187-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enlisted on 2 January 1997. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bartlett, Whitener, & Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07524-98

    Original file (07524-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to Dental Additional Special Pay (DASP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Pfeiffer and Matherws, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 April 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06707-99

    Original file (06707-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner 2. allegations of error and injustice on 8 February 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, ‘determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Oct 18 09_48_14 CDT 2000

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2NAWANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:lc Docket No: 3329-99 3 August 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: SGT~ REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ~ USMCR,1 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he...