Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02216-01
Original file (02216-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX ;
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj

Docket No: 2216-01
14 August 2001

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

par ea a eR a fen "

ee ae pis ee

    

Pee aD ett ed

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 13 July 2001
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective
Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, McPartlin, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner’s
allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the
subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the
contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the
following corrective action.

a ae nn a
Docket No: 2216-01

RECOMMENDATION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a. The reenlistment executed on or about 7 September 1999 was under the provisions
of the STAR program.

b. He was automatically advanced to paygrade E5 effective 7 September 1999.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 72376(c)) it is certified that quorum was

present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN G. L. ADAMS
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

14 August 2001 We duil > fee

Fou. W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00868-01

    Original file (00868-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bartlett, Ms. Humberd, and Ms. Newman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14

    Original file (NR2889 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05514-01

    Original file (05514-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone AE rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Morgan, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner iri_justice on 10 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03308-01

    Original file (03308-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Chapman, Mr. Exnicios, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 July 2001 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08316-01

    Original file (08316-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the pravisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was automatically advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. Lippolis, and Ms. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07991-01

    Original file (07991-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7444 13

    Original file (NR7444 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (5), PERS-81 stated that “an advisory to the petitioner’s request cannot be completed.” e. In enclosure (6), PERS-803, the NPC office with cognizance over enlisted advancements, has commented to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06053-01

    Original file (06053-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3502-13

    Original file (NR3502-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the . The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2013, and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05343-01

    Original file (05343-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone AE rating. 10 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, iIi_iirstice on Pteltter, reviewed Petitioner ’s . Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it...