Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081390C070215
Original file (2002081390C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:



         BOARD DATE: 5 AUGUST 2003
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002081390

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Gale J. Thomas Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Luther L. Santiful Chairperson
Mr. Curtis L. Greenway Member
Mr. Ronald J. Weaver Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Reentry Eligibility (RE) code be corrected to reflect RE-1 vice RE-4.

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) has determined that he was physically fit, therefore his reentry code should be recalculated.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

He initially enlisted in the United States Army Reserve and on 27 May 1988, he enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty.

In April 1993 a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) determined that radial nerve injury to his left forearm and hand, left hip pain, head fracture, and chronic low back pain rendered the applicant unfit for continued service. However, the board concluded that his condition had not stabilized sufficiently and recommended his name be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TRDL) with subsequent reexamination.

On 13 May 1993 the applicant was released from active duty and the following day his name was placed on the TDRL. His RE code was recorded as “RE-4” and his SPD (Separation Program Designator) Code was recorded as “SFK.”

In March 1994, following reexamination of the applicant’s condition, a PEB concluded that the applicant had made an excellent recovery from his left upper and lower extremity injuries permitting final determination concerning his fitness for duty. The PEB concluded that the applicant was fit for military duty, and recommended his return to duty.

Effective 22 April 1994 the applicant’s name was removed from TDRL, and he was found fit for duty.

On 20 June 1994, the applicant was given the opportunity to reenlist within 90 days following his removal from the TDRL in the component and grade in which he was serving prior to placement on the list. At that time the applicant elected to reenlist in the Regular Army, however there is no indication he ever did so.

Army Regulation 635-5 establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the Department of Defense Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). In pertinent part, it directs that a separation report (DD Form 214) will be prepared at the conclusion of a period of active Federal



service. An individual whose name is placed on the TDRL is considered to have been released from active Federal service and as such is issued a DD Form 214. While on the TDRL individuals do not accumulated active Federal service and as such when their names are removed from the TDRL and either returned to duty, permanently retired, or discharged from the service, a new DD Form 214 is not issued as they are not in an “active” status.

Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment. That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes. RE-4 applies to individuals who were separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification. Soldiers who were separated, discharged, or retired from their term of service because of physical disability are ineligible for reenlistment and receive an RE-4.

Army Regulation 635-5-1 states that SPD codes are three-character alphabetic combinations, which identify reasons for, and types of separation from active duty. The primary purpose of SPD codes is to provide statistical accounting of reasons for separation. They are intended exclusively for the internal use of DOD and the military services to assist in the collection and analysis of separation data. It notes that “SFK” is the appropriate SPD code for individuals released from active duty and their names placed on the TDRL.

A “cross-reference” chart, provided by officials from the separations branch at the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command, confirms that “RE-4” is the appropriate RE code for individuals who receive an SPD code of SFK.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The applicant was separated from active duty because of a disability and as such, was not eligible to reenlist, and received an SPD code of SFK and an RE code of 4. The RE code was proper, based on the circumstances of his separation. The fact that the applicant was found fit for duty, but did not reenlist, does not change the applicant's original reason for his 1993 separation from active duty and does not serve as a basis to change his correctly assigned RE code.



2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LLS __ __CLG__ __RJW __ DENY APPLICATION




                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2002081390
SUFFIX
RECON YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED 2003.08.13
TYPE OF DISCHARGE (HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR . . . . .
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 110.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024146

    Original file (20110024146.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s record contains a physical evaluation board (PEB) proceeding that shows a PEB convened on 1 April 2010 to determine the applicant's fitness for retention on active duty. It states that the SPD code SFK is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40, by reason of temporary disability. Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes: a. RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075170C070403

    Original file (2002075170C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was separated from active duty because of disability and as such, he was not eligible to reenlist, and received an SPD code of SFK and an RE code of 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000756

    Original file (20120000756.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of his separation code and reentry eligibility (RE) code with the intention of returning to military service. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) states the SPD code of "SFK" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(2), for temporary disability. There is no available evidence showing whether or not he is still on the TDRL, or has been removed and permanently separated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022411

    Original file (20100022411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was retired in accordance with Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24b(2), by reason of temporary disability. The regulation provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant’s retirement was based on the fact that he underwent a PEB that found him physically unfit to perform duties...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016094

    Original file (20080016094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This form also shows he completed 12 years of creditable military service. There is no evidence in the applicant’s records that he reenlisted after his removal from the TDRL. At the time of his separation, he received a separation code of SFK and an RE code of 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009627

    Original file (20110009627.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 601-210, paragraph 5-53a, states medical waivers for RA and USAR enlistment may be considered for former enlisted members if: a. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD of SFK was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in Army Regulation 635-5-1 for Soldiers separating under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006599

    Original file (20110006599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110006599 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, his records show he was retired due to a temporary disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065073C070421

    Original file (2001065073C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that item 28 of her DD Form 214 should show the entry “Temporarily Retired due to Disability” instead of the entry “Disability, Severance Pay.” In support of her application, she submits copies of: her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile); Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination); Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History); DA Form 5181-R (Screening Note of Acute Medical Care); Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018439

    Original file (20130018439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 sets forth the basic authority for the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of a physical disability. Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. However, the evidence of record shows he was determined unfit for duty in 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074842C070403

    Original file (2002074842C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, the applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code and his separation (SPD) code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected so that he can reenlist in the Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Nevertheless, the applicant was separated from active duty in July 1992...