DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JRE
Docket No: 1563-01
6 December 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552,
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 29 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 5 February to 30 March
1979, when you were discharged for the convenience of the government because of an
erroneous enlistment. There is no indication in available records that you were unfit to
perform the duties of your rank by reason of a physical disability incurred in or aggravated
by your brief period of naval service. With regard to your request for correction of your
record to reflect your change of name, the Board noted that you were issued a DD Form 215
on 20 January 1994 reflecting your new name.
which direct that your prior name be expunged from your naval record.
There are no provisions of law or regulation
In view of the foregoing, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07936-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 CRS Docket No: 7936-01 21 November 2001 Dear This is in reference to your application for'correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. t- '7 _ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05719-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 August 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09403-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00167-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,’ together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05480-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02231-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2001. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you received an undesirable discharge on 2 September 1960. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02766-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2001. Although it is unfortunate that you were erroneously given a military identification card with an expiration date in 1999, as well 1910/27, dated 20 June 1994, which authorized you to proceed home as a NAVEPERS Form awaiting transfer to the Temporary Disability Retired List, those actions did not create an entitlement to disability retirement. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06167-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 18 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences total-led more than six months. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04971-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04830-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 June 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. condition, and the fraudulent...