Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01365-01
Original file (01365-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRAECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE
Docket No: 1365-01
18 June 2001

 

1:

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 31 May 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you served on active duty from 3 to 18 June 1998, when you were
discharged by reason of erroneous entry based on your disclosure of an extensive history of
treatment for depression. In addition, you reported having had long periods when you felt
depressed and helpless, and experienced suicidal ideation and loss of enjoyment of normal
activities. You also disclosed a history of illegal use of marijuana, cocaine and mushrooms.
You were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4, as required by governing directives.

The Board noted that your reenlistment code was properly assigned. It was not persuaded
that you are suitable for further service, or that it would be in the interest of justice to take
any action which might facilitate your reentry into the Armed Forces. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request. :

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the

burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01332-01

    Original file (01332-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 June 2000. You denied a history of psychiatric symptoms or treatment on the front side of the form, and disclosed a history of counseling for “normal teenage rebellion” on the reverse side. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01411-00

    Original file (01411-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    doctor placed you in a temporary status of not physically qualified from status after that date. concluded that your medical history was sufficient to support a decision that you should not be reenlisted in the Naval Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00

    Original file (06039-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10703-06

    Original file (10703-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 21 July 2000 at age 18. On 11 August 2000, during a psychiatric...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01

    Original file (03279-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01087-01

    Original file (01087-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in considered your application on Documentary regulations and policies. You were so discharged on 27 November 1995 and assigned and waived the right to Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals discharged by reason of erroneous...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01269-09

    Original file (01269-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06002-01

    Original file (06002-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06258-01

    Original file (06258-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 5 March 1995 you were referred for evaluation because of a previously undisclosed history of outpatient psychiatric counseling and suicidal ideation. the psychiatric evaluation with its diagnosis that you suffer from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07912-00

    Original file (07912-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. record, and you have submitted none, to show that your actions while in recruit training were not as described in the psychiatric evaluation or that the diagnosis was not supported by the history and other information presented to the psychologist. Consequently,...