Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01364-01
Original file (01364-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ecb
Docket No: 1364-01
17 July 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser 
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory
334/06303 dated 11 June 2001, a copy of which is

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE  
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

NAVY

5722 INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

To:

IN REPLY REFER 
1133
Ser 
al  

du_n  

01

334/06303

From:
To:

Commander,
Executive Director,

Navy Recruiting Command

Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

BCNR REQUEST ICO

Ref:

(a) PHONCON BUPERS  

(N132DlO)  YNCS (SW)

COMNAVCRUITCOM (Code 33421) OS1

(SW)

of 3 May 01

Encl:

(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 01364-01

Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).

1.
applicant was allowed to enlist as  
in service.

Per reference (a),
PN2/E-5  due to excessive break

This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for

2.
Correction of Naval Records only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.

.-  

_

.,_.

By direction---

w 

--

“ ~

_

l



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01197-01

    Original file (01197-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02932-01

    Original file (02932-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicant was authorized to reenlist as an Per reference (a), ABH3/E-4 was disapproved This is an advisory memorandum for use by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07350-00

    Original file (07350-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03054-01

    Original file (03054-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02184-01

    Original file (02184-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. applicant was authorized to reenlist as an Per reference (a), CTM2/E-5 was disapproved Applicant's experience gained CTM2/E-5.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05159-00

    Original file (05159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03856-01

    Original file (03856-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. applicant's request to reenlist as an (21, Per references (a) AME3/E-4 Applicant was This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 3203-01

    Original file (3203-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2001. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 SER copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02433-01

    Original file (02433-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 This is in reference to your application for correction of your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01092-01

    Original file (01092-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC letter 1133 Ser attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.