DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 300-01
10 October 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 2 1 September 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the CNO MSG 1512252 DEC 00. Effective dates of intitlement for Special Duty Assignment
Pay (SDAP) are assigned by the Commander, Naval Personnel Command. Accordingly to the
above message it was the intention of the Personnel Command to initiate SDAP entitlement for
Classifiers at PSD PENSACOLA effective 15 December 2000. They could have authorized an
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The
earlier effective date but elected not to.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
ww. D EA N
WEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01272-01
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum of 1160 PERS 815 of 13 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was attached on board UIC 62229. b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04038-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2003. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N13OD1 /03U0180 6 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDSSubj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDAT Q IN THE CASE OFEnd: (1) BCNR case file #04038-02 with microfiche service record1. SDAP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08924-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 20350-2000IN REPLY REFER TO: 5420 N13QD/ 03U0561 8 Aug 2003MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03715-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7074 13
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to che proceedings of this Board. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03577-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05593-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 5730 PERS 4011 of 26 Jul 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 0054-01
1552 Encl : F:orm 149 w/attachments (1) DD (2) CNO memorandum 5420 N (3) Subject ’s naval record 130D l/O 1 U 1175 of 2 August 2001 Pursuant to th#E provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Caron, and Ms. Madison, reviewed 5 September 2001 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01904-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Special Duty Assignment Pay (SDAP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 September 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01945-01
He also stated that a member could bank time from other commands because flight time was flight time, no matter where a member flew. e to my office to look over Master Chief inal documentation ere was no way possible tha a as Fr To Subj: LIGHT RECORDS After reviewing subject members NATOPS Jacket and Service 1. In this case, the reporting senior made it clear in block-42 Comments on Performance, the reason for preparing the report as he did.