DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
JRE
Docket No: 8142-98
25 May 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 May 1999.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and injustice,
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board did not accept your contention that you did not withhold information about your
health when you underwent your pre-enlistment physical examination, as that contention is
belied by the available records. The Board noted that despite having undergone two
operations to place shunts in your skull, and taking anti-convulsant medication for an
extended period of time, you did not disclose those matters in answer to items 18-21 of the
Standard Form 93, Statement of Medical History, you completed on 2 April 1997.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 03150-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board carefully considered your contention that your disabilities did not exist prior to your enlistment in the Marine Corps; however, in the absence of evidence which substantiates that contention and demonstrates that your dysthymic disorder was incurred in or agmvated by your naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03992-97
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board carefully considered your contention and accompanying medical evidence which indicates that your pain may have been due to sciatic neuropathy resulting from an injection you received while on active duty, but found it insufficient to warrant any corrective action in your case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02780-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05469-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 March 1999 at age twenty six. You were advised that if you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08626-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 June 1998, the Record Review Panel of the Physical Evaluation Board found you fit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Dec 28 09_38_41 CST 2000
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The record shows that you received Because of leg pain caused by the residuals of a gun shot wound you received prior to entering the Marine Corps, you were processed for a medical discharge. contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06306-02
tiith administrative regulations and procedures Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 6 December 1999, at age 29. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06046-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In finding that the reporting senior ’s letter to your physical evaluation board did not contradict the contested fitness report, they noted that he expressly acknowledged, in the report, that the “problem” he cited “has not prevented [you] from continuing to carry out [your] routine medical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05542-97
waiver for enlistment in July 1989 but also had five or more At this time you were recurrent episodes since that time. The medical report noted, in Your record On 14 June 1990 a medical board diagnosed you with recurrent herpes The board noted that a simples keratitis of the right eye. you were so separated and assigned an On 3 July 1990 RR-3P reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03598-01
After careful and conscientious'consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 8 March 2000 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of unsatisfactory participation due to failure to attend regularly When scheduled drills in October, November, and December 1999. informed of the recommendation, you elected to...