DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 6949-97
20 May 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 6 May 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that your name was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List,
and you were discharged from the Navy on 9 March 1995 because of your failure to report
for a final physical examination.
connection with your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in
your case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In the absence of evidence of error or injustice in
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02616-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04418-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2010. On 19 July 1999, you were discharged from active duty with an entry level separation and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code based on your performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08626-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 June 1998, the Record Review Panel of the Physical Evaluation Board found you fit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06281-07
Documentarymaterial considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 21 May 1992 after more than nine months of prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Thu Feb 01 14_50_25 CST 2001
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In a letter dated 3 July 1999, you were notified by the The Board concluded that the finding of fitness made in your case by the Physical Evaluation Board was warranted, given the absence of unfitting residuals of your stomach surgery at the time of your final periodic examination, and your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06422-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were entitled to a disability rating of 30% or higher at the time of your discharge, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03498-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. you were referred to the On 15 July 1999 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the personality disorder....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1908 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction: of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01104-01
Correction,of Naval A three-member panel of the Board for Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. have the best reenlistment code authorized by regulations, and have been treated no differently than others discharged by reason of hardship, the Board could not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 August 1999, your proposed administrative separation was forwarded to the discharge authority recommending a general discharge, which was approved by the discharge authority on 7 You were so discharged on 9...