D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 4004-99
30 August 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 August 1999. Your allegations of error, and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board concurred with the finding and recommendation
made in your case by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery on 19 April 1999, that you
did not meet established physical standards, and that a waiver of those standards was not
recommended. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
-
records.
burden is
injustice.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01921-99
An RE-4 reenlistment code means that the individual is ineligible for reenlistment without prior approval from Commander, Naval Personnel Command. Absent evidence to the contrary, a presumption exists that action by the Navy to discharge you by reason of "failed physical standards" was both appropriate and proper. Since you received the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulation, the Board could find no error or injustice in the assigned reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01896-02
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03651-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03129-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 May 1999, a copy of which is attached. Notwithstanding the petitioner's statement and the letter from the Reporting Senior, the Board is not convinced that the 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07956-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06500-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07189-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 19 August 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge was erroneous or unjust, and shows that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03838-99
application, together with all material applicable statutes, regulations and opinion furnished by CMC attached. ecords, sitting in executive allegations of error and injustice procedures applicable to the the Board consisted of your your naval record and considered the advisory 1999, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire rekord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05839-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02052-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. You were so discharged on 19 May 1943. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.