D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW A N N U
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 365 1-99
30 August 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 26 August 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 31 October to 16
December 1988, when you were discharged by reason of deficient entry level performance
and conduct. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty because of a
disability which was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the
Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01896-02
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07956-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05839-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03838-99
application, together with all material applicable statutes, regulations and opinion furnished by CMC attached. ecords, sitting in executive allegations of error and injustice procedures applicable to the the Board consisted of your your naval record and considered the advisory 1999, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire rekord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07189-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your application on 19 August 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge was erroneous or unjust, and shows that you were unfit by reason of physical disability at that time, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04004-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07911-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board was not persuaded that you lacked mental responsibility at the times you committed the offenses which resulted in your discharge, or that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04461-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 05195-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08801-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 1999. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your condition was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...