Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03821-98
Original file (03821-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON, D.C. 203704100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 3821-98
9 February 1999

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by bupers MEMORANDUM 1780 ser 604 OF 19 AUGUST 1998, a copy of
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

1780
Ser 604
19 Aug 98

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

a
Ref:

Assistant for BCNR Matters  

(Pers-OOXCB)

MENDATIONS ICO:

(a) BUPERS memo 5420 Pers-OOXCB of 4 Aug 98
(b) Title 38,

United States Code, Chapter 30

1.

The following is provided in response to reference (a):

a.

A review of LT

that he disenrolled from the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) on
12 May 1989.
irrevocable.

Per reference (b),

the decision to disenroll is

master microfiche record indicates

b.

A review of the documentation provided by LT

not indicate any counseling inconsistencies.
provide additional documentation from the Commanding Officer or
Briefing Officer where the alleged miscounseling occurred, or a
signed statement from anyone who can substantiate his claim, a
more favorable recommendation could be given.

Howeve

.does
he can

The Pers-604 point of contact is

2.
882-2506.

nal Benefit

Manager (Pers-604)

Programs



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08842-98

    Original file (08842-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 SER of which is attached. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP Unfortunately, account on 9 October 1996...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07316-98

    Original file (07316-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. The Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) was a voluntary contributory program in which Navy matched each dollar contributed by the member with two dollars. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP account...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04694-01

    Original file (04694-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    25 September 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08817-02

    Original file (08817-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02906-01

    Original file (02906-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1780 PER-604 dated 22 May 2001, a copy of which attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01943-01

    Original file (01943-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS 604 of 12 June 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03022-01

    Original file (03022-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03877-01

    Original file (03877-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 PERS attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07842-02

    Original file (07842-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03727-01

    Original file (03727-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS is attached. The following is provided in response to reference (a): a.