Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065824C070421
Original file (2001065824C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 2 April 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001065824

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Ms. Wanda L. Waller Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. Arthur A. Omartian Chairperson
Mr. Roger W. Able Member
Ms. Karen Y. Fletcher Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart.

APPLICANT STATES: That he should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury that was directly caused by an enemy mortar attack on his unit. He contends that on the night of 17 June 1968, while he was walking down a road to his battalion area, his unit came under an enemy mortar attack. He states that the mortar rounds were landing closer and closer to the road and he decided to take cover in a ditch when he hit his foot on a large rock that he could not see in the dark. After the attack, his foot swelled and he received medical attention for this injury. In support of his application, he submits a letter, dated 25 November 2001; a Statement of Facts, dated 25 November 2001; a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge); page 3 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); an Operational Report of 2d Battalion, 17th Artillery for period ending 31 July 1968, dated 10 August 1968; and a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 18 June 1968.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was inducted on 25 July 1967. He served as a field artillery basic in Vietnam from 31 December 1967 through 21 December 1968 and was honorably released on 24 July 1969.

The applicant’s DD Form 214, which was authenticated in his own hand, does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.

There is no evidence in the applicant’s service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action

His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not reflect entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

Evidence of record shows that on 6 May 1969 the applicant underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any wounds sustained as a result of hostile action.

In support of his claim for the Purple Heart, the applicant provided a copy of the Operational Report of 2d Battalion, 17th Artillery for the period ending 31 July 1968. This report shows that a mortar attack occurred on 17 June 1968 and two personnel were slightly injured.




The applicant also provided a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 18 June 1968, which shows the entry, “Hit toe on rock last night during alert.” However, there is no evidence that this injury was the result of hostile action.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. The Board considered the applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart for an injury that was directly caused by an enemy mortar attack on his unit.

2. The Board also noted the medical record which the applicant provided and that this record shows an injury to his right great toe. However, there is no evidence of record which shows that competent medical authority determined that this injury was the result of hostile action.

3. The applicant signed his DD Form 214 on 24 July 1969 attesting to the fact that he was not entitled to award of the Purple Heart.

4. The preponderance of evidence in this case shows that the applicant was not wounded or otherwise entitled to award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the Board determined that there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

AAO____ RWA____ KYF_____ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001065824
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020402
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
DATE OF DISCHARGE
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
DISCHARGE REASON
BOARD DECISION (DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 107.0015
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012493

    Original file (20130012493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. However, in the absence of orders or documentation that conclusively shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004887

    Original file (20110004887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The former fellow Soldier stated: * a rocket penetrated the bunker in the applicant's sleeping area * the applicant was not seriously injured in the attack * he assessed the applicant's injuries and determined he didn't need medical care beyond his own medical treatment and bandaging * he failed to complete a Field Medical Card for the applicant's injuries * he provided a copy of his own DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078739C070215

    Original file (2002078739C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of three bronze service stars for wear on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017020

    Original file (20140017020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The communications center where the applicant was assigned was also under attack and explosions were occurring all around them. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Based on these statements, it appears the applicant ran from the communications center during the mortar fire attack and ran into the wall surrounding the building and knocked himself unconscious.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021323

    Original file (20120021323.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. An email, dated 23 January 2012, from a Verizon email user who states he was the unit medic at the time in question and that he treated the applicant for a small concussion at Vinh Kim after a mortar round knocked him off his feet in February 1969. c. A statement, dated 12 January 2012, from a radio telephone operator who served in the same unit at the time. Therefore, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015421

    Original file (20100015421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which show the applicant was awarded MOS 11B. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statements provided by the applicant alone are not sufficient as a basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003270

    Original file (20090003270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 does not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's complete medical records are not available for review with this case. The former S-1 message center sergeant also states that the CSM said that the applicant was making a mistake by refusing the Purple Heart; b. in a statement, dated 13 January 2009, a comrade-in-arms and former member of the unit states that he was stationed with the applicant in the same unit as an illustrator and that during one late-night mortar attack in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004090C070206

    Original file (20050004090C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Meritorious Service Medal. The applicant’s record contains a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Award), dated 19 July 1990, which shows the applicant was authorized the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 29 February 1968,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019924

    Original file (20120019924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110023324, on 3 May 2012. He served in Vietnam 20 October 1968 through 15 June 1969. c. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was in a patient status from on or about 17 April 1969 to on or about 6 July 1969. d. His service record contains a hospital message...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015325

    Original file (20130015325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a letter, dated 10 August 2013. The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action. In the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart.