Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01256-99
Original file (01256-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TRG
Docket No: 1256-99
25 May 1999

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case 
(3) Subject's naval record

Summary

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be
corrected to establish eligibility for reserve retirement.

The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Milner and Ms.

2.
Nofzieger, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 18 May 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

,"t age 17.

Petitioner enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 26 April
At that time he had completed eight years of
1955 
education and attained a GCT score of 36, which placed him in
He then completed two periods of active duty
Mental Group IV.
from 6 February 1956 to 6 November 1957 and from 2 October 1961
He was honorably discharged on 25 April 1963
to 1 August 1962.
at the expiration of his enlistment.
In one of the
credited with five years of qualifying service.
non-qualifying years he was credited with 21 retirement points,
but he received only 15 membership points in the other two years.

At that time he was

d.

On 13 March 1976, after a break in service of almost 13

years, he enlisted in the Army National Guard.
that by 12 March 1990, he had earned 14 consecutive qualifying

The record shows

years for retirement.
not a qualifying year.
Reserve control group on 1 November 1991 and did not earn any
further qualifying years.
grade of SGT (E-5) on 12 March 1995.

The next year, ending on 12 March 1991 was
Petitioner transferred to the Army

He was honorably discharged in the

e.

Petitioner was 60 years old on 31 March 1998 and

However, this request was denied
requested his retired pay.
because he has only been credited with 19 years of qualifying
service.
He applied to the Board contending that a National
Guard record of service was in error because it did not show his
He contends that
first period of active service in the Navy.
with that period of service he would have 20 qualifying years.
However, he has also submitted a National Guard Annual Statement
which correctly shows all of his periods of active service.
annual statement shows that as of 12 March 1991 he was credited
with 19 years of qualifying service.
he earned no further qualifying years after 12 March 1991.

It has been verified that

The

CONCLUSION:

The Board believes that Petitioner must have thought he

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
had 20 qualifying years in 1991 because it was certainly not in
his best interest to quit drilling at that time with 19 years of
Further, there is no documentation to show
qualifying service.
that he was counseled on his situation by anyone in the National
Guard or the Army Reserve.
education, low score on the aptitude test, and the fact that he
was only a SGT after 14 years of service in the National Guard,
and believes that he may not have understood that he did not meet
the requirements for retirement.
Petitioner's Navy retirement points have been correctly recorded,
the Board concludes that a correction to his Navy record to
establish eligibility for reserve retirement is now warranted,
essentially as a matter of clemency.

The Board notes his limited

Although it appears that

Such action can be accomplished by transferring 29 retirement
points from the excess in previous anniversary years to raise the
total in the anniversary year ending 25 April 1959 to 50, making
it a qualifying year for reserve retirement.
With this change
Petitioner's records can be updated to show that he has 20
qualifying years.
The Board notes that Petitioner will be eligible for retired pay
as a former member since he has been discharged and not retired.
However, Petitioner must be retired from his last component.
Since the Board cannot correct Army records, Petitioner will have
to apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records if

2

he wants to have the record corrected to show reserve retirement.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceeding should
be filed in Petitioner's naval records so all future reviewers
will understand the retirement point change.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by moving 29

a.
retirement points from the excess in previous anniversary years
to'the anniversary year ending 25 April 1959.

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

b.
naval record.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D.  
Recorder

ZSALMAN

Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07036-99

    Original file (07036-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    was not done in Petitioner's case and he had no status in the Marine Corps reserve after 7 April Through administrative error this According to Petitioner 1997. the message from Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) authorizing separation pay stated that he should not be authorized a reserve It is unclear from the record why this was done, but contract. If given such status the comments concerning his However, the advisory opinion does not Given his overall good record and the other the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09631-02

    Original file (09631-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to allow him the opportunity to earn reserve retirement. of the anniversary years ending on 17 August 2002 he has been credited with 15 years of qualifying service. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 10028 11

    Original file (10028 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 § COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 WJH Docket: 10028-11 13 March 2012 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ' NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is eligible...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2011-079

    Original file (2011-079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 29, 2011, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST, ALLEGATION, AND EVIDENCE The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he retired from the Coast Guard Reserve under the Reserve Transition Benefits (RTB)1 program with 15 years, 8 months, and 8 days of creditable service instead of being discharged in 1992.  The applicant was assigned to Coast Guard Reserve Unit Pittsburgh [in the SELRES] from September 1984 to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 08041-03

    Original file (08041-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that the anniversary year ending 20 April 1991 was qualifying for reserve retirement. qualifying years for his entire career except for the serious accident in April 1991, the Board concludes that corrective action is warranted. RECOMMENDATION: Therefore, the record should be corrected That Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06003-00

    Original file (06003-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he has 20 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement and that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 13 June 1990. Petitioner enlisted in the Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01523-01

    Original file (01523-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board has also been provided with a Reserve Retirement Master Control Card which shows that Petitioner has been credited with 19 years, 10 months and 21 days of service for reserve retirement. concludes that the record should be corrected to show that he has 20 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. further concludes that the best way to accomplish this action is to transfer 35 retirement points from the excess over 50 in Therefore, the Board The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02018-01

    Original file (02018-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he earned an additional nine retirement points in the anniversary year ending 4 April 1989 , thus making that a qualifying year for reserve retirement. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03038-06

    Original file (03038-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he completed 20 qualifying years for retirement and then transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged.2. At the end of his anniversary year on 4 October 1982 he was only credited with 26 of the 50 retirement points necessary for another qualifying year. Petitioner points out...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01413-01

    Original file (01413-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), commissioned officer in the United States Marine filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by moving two retirement points from one anniversary year to another. Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that as of the end of the anniversary year on 25 February 2001, he has been credited with 16 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...