Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-012
Original file (2004-012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2004-012 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

 

 
 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

The applicant requested that the Board reinstate his entitlement to the Zone B selective 
reenlistment bonus (SRB) that was promised to him when he reenlisted for six years on June 9, 
2003.  The applicant reenlisted at that time to have enough obligated service to complete a full 
three-year  tour  of  duty  upon  reporting  to  his  new  duty  station  under  permanent  change  of 
station (PCS) orders issued on February 24, 2003. The orders stated, "This assignment requires a 
minimum  of three years [obligated service]."  The orders also stated that the period of travel 
was between June 1, 2003 and July 1, 2003, with the applicant to report to his new command by 
July 1, 2003.   The applicant's then enlistment was due to expire on March 5, 2006.  Therefore, 
upon  reporting  to  his  new  duty  station  on  July  1,  2003,  the  applicant  would  have  been 
approximately  four  months  short  of  having  the  necessary  three  years  of  obligated  service  as 
required in the PCS orders.  So, on June 9, 2003, instead of executing a four-month extension, 
the  applicant  chose  to  reenlist  for  six-years  to  fulfill  the  obligated  service  requirement  upon 
reporting to his new duty station and to obtain an SRB. 

 
Subsequent to reporting to the new duty station, the applicant was informed by Coast 
Guard Personnel Command (CGPC) that he was not eligible for the SRB because according to 
Article 4.B.6.a.2. of the Personnel Manual, he already had three years of service remaining on 
his then enlistment (apparently CGPC used the date the orders were issued rather than the date 
the  applicant  was  due  to  report  to  his  new  duty  station  in  calculating  the  three  year 
requirement).  Article  4.B.6.a.2.  states  the  following:    "Personnel  E-4  and  above  with  over  six 
years of active duty are considered to be in a career status.  Unless otherwise indicated, they are 
required to have one year of [obligated service] upon reporting to the new unit." Emphasis added.  
Although required to have three years, when the applicant reported to his unit on July 1, 2003, 
he had only two years and eight months of obligated service remaining.  
 

The Judge Advocate General (TJAG) of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board 
grant  relief.  He  stated  that  the  applicant  was  required  to  obligate  additional  service  to  have 
three  years  of  service  remaining  upon  reporting  to  his  new  duty  station.    He  noted  that  the 
applicant was required to obligate an additional four months to have the three years of service 
required by the PCS orders.  
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

The Personnel Manual requires that members in pay grade E-4 and above with six years 
of active duty, like the applicant, have one year of remaining obligated service upon reporting to 
a new duty station, unless otherwise indicated.  The applicant's PCS orders clearly stated that the 
applicant was required to have a minimum of three years of obligated service.  The applicant 
was scheduled to report to his new duty station by July 1, 2003, at which time he would have  
had two years and eight months of obligated service remaining on his then current enlistment. 
Therefore, he was required to extend or reenlist for an additional four months to have the full 

three  years  of  obligated  service  required  by  his  PCS  orders.    When  a  member  is  required  to 
extend or reenlist for transfer purposes, he or she may extend or reenlist for a longer period to 
obtain an SRB, which is the applicant's situation.  See Article 3.C.5. of the Personnel Manual.   

 
The Coast Guard committed an error by refusing to pay the SRB and by informing the 
applicant  that  he  was  not  eligible  for  the  SRB  because  he  had  the  necessary  three  years  of 
obligated  service  before  the  PCS  orders  were  issued.    The  obligated  service  requirement  is 
calculated from the time of reporting to the new duty station, not from the time of issuance of 
PCS orders.  See Article 4.B.6. of the Personnel Manual.  Accordingly the applicant is entitled to 
relief. 
 

ORDER 

The military record of XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, USCG, shall be corrected to show that he 
reenlisted  on  June  9,  2003  and  was  entitled  to  a  Zone  B  SRB  under  ALCOAST  329/02.    The 
Coast Guard shall pay the applicant the SRB to which he is entitled under this contract.   

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 
 Philip B. Busch 

 

 
 
 Richard Walter 

 

 
 Suzanne L. Wilson 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
June 30, 2004 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-135

    Original file (2003-135.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated May 20, 2004, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to make him eligible for a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 with a multiple of 2 by permitting him to reenlist for six years prior to June 3, 2003. Coast Guard members who have at least 6 but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. There was...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-055

    Original file (2004-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The statement indicates that the transfer orders he received in the fall of 2002 required him to obligate sufficient service to complete a full tour of duty at the new unit before reporting to it on January 19, 2003.1 Before signing a contract to obligate the service, the applicant was counseled about SRBs by a yeoman second class (YN2) at his prior command and was told that there was no multiple for MK3s but that there was a multiple for MK2s.2 At 1 Article 4.B.6. of the Personnel Manual],...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-018

    Original file (2002-018.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 26, 2002, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by substituting the three-year extension agreement he signed on March 27, 2001, with a three-year extension agreement dated for May 2, 2001. of the Personnel Manual provides that members serving in a grade E-4 and above with fewer than six years of active duty may not accept PCS orders Final Decision in BCMR Docket No. The applicant extended his...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-055

    Original file (1999-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, on November 16, 1998, the applicant signed a third extension contract, extending his enlistment for two years and six months, through February 3, 200x. The Chief Counsel explained that the applicant’s PCS orders to xxxxx stated that he was required to have at least three years of obligated service before reporting to his new unit. Unless otherwise indicated, they are required to have one year of OBLI- SERV remaining upon reporting to the new unit.” ALDIST 290/98, issued on...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-044

    Original file (2001-044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no administrative entry (“page 7”) in the applicant’s record document- ing counseling about his obligated service requirement prior to accepting transfer orders, as required by Article 4.B.1.i.1.b. There is also no page 7 documenting counseling about the applicant’s obligated service requirement upon accepting his PCS orders, as required under Article 4.B.1.i.1.b. The application of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, USCG, for correction of his ORDER military record is granted as follows: His...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-176

    Original file (2002-176.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 19, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 based on his pay grade as a BM1 and calculated with a multiple of two for the four-year reenlistment contract that he signed on June 12, 2002, upon receipt of transfer orders to a new unit. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On December 23, 2002, the Chief...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-058

    Original file (1999-058.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated November 18, 1999, is signed by the three duly RELIEF REQUESTED DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. The Chief Counsel further stated that the applicant knowingly extended his enlistment for six years to receive an SRB based on his additional obligated service. After ALDIST 135/97 became effective on July 1, 1997, the applicant was eligible to receive an...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-048

    Original file (2002-048.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief Counsel contended that the Board should find that the Coast Guard had no duty to counsel the applicant regarding the potential effect of his April 30, 1997 reenlistment on future SRB eligibility. of the Personnel Manual provides that members who receive PCS orders must be counseled about obligated service requirements and sign a page 7 documenting that counseling. The Board finds that if the applicant had received proper counseling, as urged by the Chief Counsel, the required...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-039

    Original file (2004-039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 6 but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. If the applicant had been properly counseled, it would be reasonable to assume that he would have extended for one (01) year to meet the obligated service requirement to accept his orders and prior to the effective date of the extension [July 11, 2003] he would have reenlisted for the Zone B SRB multiple of [2.5] that he was promised. The...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-108

    Original file (2003-108.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By that time, ALCOAST 182/03 was in effect and the SRB multiple for MK2s in Zone A was just 1.5.5 In support of his allegations, the applicant pointed out that his command failed to have him sign a CG-3307 (“page 7”) to acknowledge receiving proper SRB counseling when he signed the one-year extension contract on November 18, 2002. Therefore, the Board finds that the applicant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was miscounseled in November 2002 that, if he extended...