Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-090
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
 
 
BCMR Docket  
No.  2001-090 

 
 
Application for Correction of  
Coast Guard Record of: 
 
 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 
    

  FINAL DECISION 

 
ULMER, Chair: 
 
 
The  applicant,  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  asked  the 
Board  to  correct  his  record  to  show  that  he  reenlisted  for  six  years  on  March  2,  2001,  rather  than 
March 1, 2001.  He stated this correction would allow him to receive a Zone B (selective reenlistment 
bonus) SRB as an E-6 rather than an E-5, even though he was advised recently that he was not eligible 
for  the  SRB  because  he  had  more  than  10  years  of active duty on March 1, 2001.  (Under the SRB 
regulation, a member can have nor more than 10 years of service to be eligible for a Zone B SRB.)  The 
applicant disagreed that he had more 10 years of active duty on that date.  Prior to enlisting in the 
Coast  Guard  on  May  7,  1991,  the  applicant  spent  4  months  and  9  days  on  active  duty  in  a  Naval 
Reserve program.   
 

The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant was improperly promised a Zone B SRB on March 
1, 2001 because he had more than 10 years of service on the date.  He recommended that the Board 
grant alternative relief by correcting the applicant's record to show that he reenlisted for six years on 
December 27, 2000, (his tenth anniversary on active duty) and was eligible for a Zone B SRB with a 
multiple of 1 pursuant to ALDIST 218/00. The applicant did not reply to the advisory opinion. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

 
 
The Board agrees with the comments and recommendation of the Chief Counsel of the Coast 
Guard  and  finds  that  the  applicant  was  erroneously  promised  a  Zone  B  for  his  March  1,  2001 
reenlistment.  The Coast Guard also failed to counsel the applicant with respect to his right to reenlist 
on his 10 active duty anniversary for the purpose of obtaining an SRB.  The relief recommended by 
the by the Chief Counsel should be granted. 
 

ORDER 

 
 
The application of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, for correction of his military 
record is granted.  His record shall be corrected, with his consent, to show that he reenlisted for six 
years on December 27, 2000, to obtain a Zone B SRB with the appropriate multiple. The Coast Guard 
shall pay the applicant the amount due him as a result of this correction. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Terence W. Carlson 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
Date:_April 11, 2002 
 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

 
 

 

 
 

Robert A. Monniere 

 

 
Mark A. Tomicich 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2001-090

    Original file (2001-090.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2001-090 Application for Correction of Coast Guard Record of: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx FINAL DECISION ULMER, Chair: The applicant, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on March 2, 2001, rather than March 1, 2001. The applicant disagreed that he had more 10 years of active duty on that date. He recommended that the Board grant alternative relief by correcting the applicant's...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-149

    Original file (2002-149.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not eligible to receive the promised SRB because on the date his extension became operative (May 28, 2002), he had more than 6 years of active duty service. On November 29, 2002, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board correct the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted for 3 years on his 6-year anniversary. The Board finds that the applicant was not properly counseled, and that if he had been, he would have extended his enlistment on April 20, 2000,...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-024

    Original file (2002-024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    They shall sign a page 7 service record entry, enclosure (3) outlining the effect that particular action has on their SRB entitlement.” Article 3.b. The Board finds that although the applicant would not have reenlisted for six years for an SRB he was not eligible for on October 9, 2001, he would have either been discharged or allowed to reenlist for three, four, five, or six years, notwithstanding his ineligibility to receive a Zone B SRB. Accordingly, the Board should deny the applicant’s...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-078

    Original file (1999-078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (3) of COMDTINST 7220.33, the applicant’s extension did not qualify her to receive an SRB because, although it was signed on January 21, 1998, it did not become operative until October 31, 1998, almost six months past her tenth anniversary on active duty. (3) of Enclosure (1) to Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that to be eligible for a Zone B SRB, a member must “[h]ave completed at least 6 but not more than 10 years active service on the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-008

    Original file (2002-008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated September 12, 2002 is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was discharged, and immediately reenlisted for a period of six years on his tenth anniversary of military service1 for the purpose of receiving a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). (1) of Enclosure (1) to the Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that members with...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-028

    Original file (2002-028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that “if proper counseling was done, [the applicant] would have cancelled the two extensions from her commanding officer 1 According to the SRB regulation, a member must enlist or extend for a minimum of 36 months to receive an SRB. He further stated there is no requirement that the Coast Guard re- counsel its members about a subsequent ALCOAST announcing new SRB multiples. (3), states, in pertinent part, as follows: “Members with exactly 6 years active duty on the date of...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-039

    Original file (2000-039.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that if he had known about the requirement that he be in pay grade E-5 to receive a Zone B SRB, he would not have reenlisted for six years but would have 1 SRBs vary according to the length of each member’s active duty service, the length of the period of reenlistment or extension of enlistment, and the need of the Coast Guard for personnel with the member’s particular skills, which is reflected in the multiple used to calculate the bonus. Coast Guard members in pay grade E-5 and...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-132

    Original file (2002-132.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, date May 22, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by canceling the reenlistment contract he signed on August 15, 2000 and reenlisting him for six years to obtain a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). On May 19, 2000, the Commandant of the Coast Guard issued ALCOAST 218/00, which authorized members in the XX rating in Zone A to receive an SRB with a multiple of one-half,...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-121

    Original file (2005-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 5, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he will be entitled to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) for reenlisting on his sixth active duty anniversary in May 2001 and a Zone B SRB for reenlisting on his tenth active duty anniversary in May 2005.1 The applicant alleged that he was eligible for a Zone A SRB when he extended his original...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-100

    Original file (1999-100.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Members who have completed at least 6 years but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Members in the same rating may receive SRBs for this Zone A SRB but failed to do so. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On November 17, 1999, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief in this case by correcting his record to show that he...