Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015407
Original file (AR20130015407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  	Ms. 

      BOARD DATE:  	14 May 2014

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130015407
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the examiner’s Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.





      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to honorable.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she injured her ankle during basic training.  She went to the doctor several times and was unable to finish the training.  She followed all of the rules and regulations and would like to have this error corrected.  She would like to apply for a veteran’s vending license.  

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		19 August 2013
b. Discharge received:			Uncharacterized
c. Date of Discharge:			1 April 1999
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Entry Level Performance and Conduct, Chapter 11, 						AR 635-200, JGA, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment:			E Company, 2nd Battalion, 39th Infantry TR TC, Fort 						Jackson, SC
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:  	IADT 25 February 1999, term NIF 
g. Current Enlistment Service:  	0 years, 1 month, 7 days
h. Total Service:			0 years, 3 months, 22 days
i. Time Lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		ARNG (NIF-990224), NA										(Concurrent Service)
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-2
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	None
m. GT Score:				NIF
n. Education:				NIF
o. Overseas Service:			None
p. Combat Service:			None
q. Decorations/Awards:		None
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		NIF 
u. Prior Board Review:			No

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant’s enlistment contract for the Army National Guard (ARNG) is NIF.  Her DD Form 214 shows on 25 February 1999, she was ordered to active duty for initial active duty training (IADT).  She was 32 years old at the time.  Before being released from active duty she was attending basic training at Fort Jackson, SC.




SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

1.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  

2.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, with the reason specified as entry level performance and conduct, and the characterization described as uncharacterized.  The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JGA and a reentry (RE) code of 3.  

3.  The applicant’s available record does not contain any evidence of actions under the UCMJ or unauthorized absences or time lost.

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD

There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the available record.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 

The applicant provided an online applicant dated 9 August 2013, DD Form149 dated 6 August 2013, a photo of her ID card, SSN Card and ID tags.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None provided with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY  

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 3-9 contains guidance on entry level separations.  It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service.

2.  Chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status (ELS).  An uncharacterized service description is normally granted to Soldiers separating under this chapter.  

3.  A general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and an honorable discharge (HD) is rarely ever granted.  An HD may be given only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.


ANALYST’S DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of her discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s available military records and the issue submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and government regularity is presumed in the discharge process.  

3.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with a characterization of service described as uncharacterized.  Barring evidence to the contrary, it appears that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  The applicant contends that she injured her ankle during basic training.  She went to the doctor several times and was unable to finish the training.  She followed all of the rules and regulations and would like to have this error corrected.  She would like to apply for a veteran’s vending license.  The applicant’s contentions were carefully considered; however, the Board is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because her personnel record does not show any of the facts or circumstances leading to her discharge from the Army.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

5.  Therefore, based on the available evidence, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service appear to be proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief. 


SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review       Date:  14 May 2014       Location:  Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  NA 

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  NA 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		No
Change Characterization to:	No Change
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	NA
Change RE Code to:		NA
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					NA




















Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130015407



Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024570

    Original file (AR20100024570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011022

    Original file (AR20130011022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, documents submitted by the applicant show that on 20 August 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, paragraph 11-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct because of her pregnancy. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110008590

    Original file (AR20110008590.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008793

    Original file (AR20130008793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011152

    Original file (AR20090011152.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, paragraph 11-3, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to pass the Army Physical Fitness Test, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when her...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003974

    Original file (AR20130003974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to general under honorable conditions and a change to the narrative reason for separation to medical. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100030188

    Original file (AR20100030188.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007354

    Original file (AR20130007354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record. Moreover, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that she was told by her chain of command that she would receive an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021126

    Original file (AR20120021126.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized service separation. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct," and the separation code is "JGA." Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 9 October 2012; DD Form 214 for service under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005385

    Original file (AR20130005385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, a letter from the Office of Veterans Service, dated 12 March 2013, a copy of a letter from the Veterans Affairs, dated 2 March 2012, and copy of her DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable.