Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010638
Original file (AR20130010638.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  	Mr. 

      BOARD DATE:  	2 August 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130010638
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.




      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable or to general, under honorable conditions.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he struggling in life and can’t find steady work to support his family.  He would like to rejoin the Army.

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:			15 April 2013
b. Discharge Received:			Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:				20 February 2010
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code:		AR 135-178, Chapter NIF
e. Unit of assignment:				383d Engineer Co, Jonesboro, AR	
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:		12 August 2008, 6 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:		1 year, 6 months, 9 days
h. Total Service:				1 year, 6 months, 9 days
i. Time Lost:					None
j. Previous Discharges:			NIF
k. Highest Grade Achieved:			E-1
l. Military Occupational Specialty:		21B10, Combat Engineer
m. GT Score:					NIF
n. Education:					HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:				None
p. Combat Service:				None
q. Decorations/Awards:			None
r. Administrative Separation Board: 		No
s. Performance Ratings:			None
t. Counseling Statements:			No
u. Prior Board Review:				No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
On 12 August 2008, the applicant joined the Army Reserve for a period of 6 years.  He was 19 years old at the time and was a high school graduate.  He served a total of 1 year, 6 months and 9 days in the US Army Reserve.  His record does not contain any significant awards or acts of valor.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  
2.  The available record indicates that on 20 February 2010, Department of the Army, Headquarters, 416th Theater Engineer Command, Jonesboro, AR, Orders 10-051-00003, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 20 February 2010, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.

3.  The applicant’s available record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.  

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

Discharge order.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:

The applicant provided no documentation in support of his request.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None were provided with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities.  

2.  The characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army Regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army.  The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. 

3.   Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if the Soldier is in entry-level status.  However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation.



DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s record of service and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The available record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.  

2.  The applicant’s available record contains a properly constituted Order which was authenticated by the appropriate military authority.  This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the presumption of government regularity prevails in the discharge process.  

3.  Barring evidence to the contrary, it appears all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve.   

5.  The applicant contends he is struggling in life, can’t find steady work to support his family and would like to rejoin the Army.  However, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service.  Army Regulation 601-280 stipulates that an under other than honorable conditions discharge constitutes a non-waivable disqualification, thus the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  Moreover, the Board does not grant relief for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.

6.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

7.  Therefore, based on the available evidence, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief.


SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review	Date:  2 August 2013          Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  NA 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		No
Change Characterization to:	No Change
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	NA
Change RE Code to:		NA
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					NA



















Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130010638

Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014514

    Original file (AR20100014514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100308 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Performance RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 396th EN Co, Ashland, KY Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005173

    Original file (AR20120005173.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support a change to the characterization of service granted. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 12 July 2011 (but received 8 March 2012); Discharge Orders, dated 2 November 2010; DA Form 5960 (BAH...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020551

    Original file (AR20090020551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JPD (i.e., alcohol rehabilitation failure) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008517

    Original file (AR20060008517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 04 Mos, 02 Days ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012316

    Original file (AR20100012316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he was discharged for missing drills but would now like to reenlist and can’t do it with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, as stated by the applicant, with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003973

    Original file (AR20090003973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After working out family issues, I applied to rejoin the Army National Guard of Maryland. It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 1-26k, Appendix A, (Enlisted Separations) to All States Memorandum dated 20 October 1998; by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "3." c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004427

    Original file (AR20130004427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. The applicant provided documentation from the New York ARNG, which indicates that on 4 February 2009, his request for a change in his discharge was denied. Board Vote: Character Change: 2 No Change: 3 Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5 (Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020958

    Original file (AR20090020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 14 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110000692

    Original file (AR20110000692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2011/01/07 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: That he resigned in lieu of involuntary separation proceedings and was issued a General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028611

    Original file (AR20100028611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...