Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008517
Original file (AR20060008517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 060615	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 010130   
Chapter: 14    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct
RE:     SPD: JKQ
Unit/Location: A Company, Heavy Engineer, 864th Engineer Bn, Fort Lewis, Washington 98433 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  800421  
Current ENL Date: 990929    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 04 Mos, 02 Days ?????
Total Service:  01 Yrs, 04 Mos, 02 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 62E10, Heavy Construction Equipment Op    GT: 88   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states he is married with two children and has maintained steady employment.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKQ (i.e., misconduct-commission of a serious offense).  On 23 January 2001, Orders 023-0001, DA, HQ, I Corps and Fort Lewis, Military Personnel Division, Fort Lewis, WA, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date:  30 January 2001. 

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, convictions by civil authorities, desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 
      
      
      
      

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process.  That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Further, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 23 May 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      	Change     No change    (Character)
		 			       	Change     No change    (Reason)
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. 






















Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kenneth McFarley, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


MARY E. SHAW				DATE: 31 May 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060008517

Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________


Page 5 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016047

    Original file (AR20060016047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 2 November...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006029

    Original file (AR20060006029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility code of 3. That DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013360

    Original file (AR20060013360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKQ (i.e. misconduct - commission of a serious offense). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006803

    Original file (AR20060006803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070308 Lieutenant Colonel,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008787

    Original file (AR20060008787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Accordingly, the Board voted to upgrade the discharge to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: ESMERALDA G. PROCTOR DATE: 061027 Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016589

    Original file (AR20070016589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015486

    Original file (AR20060015486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011459

    Original file (AR20060011459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 03 Mos, 20 Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph-12c, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of" 3." That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011063

    Original file (AR20110011063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, based on the available...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016212

    Original file (AR20060016212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE:...